Using the iNPH Radscale as a Radiological Predictor of Clinical Outcomes after Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Placement in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH)
Debolina Ghosh1, Patrick Gilson2, Avery Kundrick2, Brendan Baugher2, James Liao2, Philippe Salles Gandara2, Claire Sonneborn2, Olivia Hogue2, Corey Fellows2, Hubert Fernandez2, Sean Nagel2
1Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Objective:

To determine the utility of the iNPH Radscale in predicting clinical outcomes of VPS placement in patients with NPH. 

Background:

NPH is treated by placement of a VPS; however, there is no standardized approach to determining surgical candidacy. The iNPH Radscale is an established scoring system for CT/MRI scans that evaluates seven radiographic features characteristic of iNPH. A Radscale score of ≥8 suggests a high probability of an iNPH diagnosis. This study aimed to assess whether the pre-surgical iNPH Radscale could be used to help determine surgical candidacy.

Design/Methods:

Patients with a clinical diagnosis of NPH who underwent VPS placement between 1/1/10-6/30/21 were included in the study. The seven Radscale parameters were measured on patients’ pre-surgical MRIs. Patient charts were reviewed to determine clinical ambulation, cognition, and urination outcomes closest to one year post-VPS and were graded using the Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I). Chi-square and ANOVA were used to determine the relationship between total Radscale scores and CGI-I scores. The Fisher’s Exact Test was used to determine the association between each Radscale sub-score and CGI-I scores. 

Results:

Out of 180 patients, 134 had complete Radscale scores and were included in this analysis. Fifty-nine percent had scores of ≥8, and 41% had scores <8. Forty-seven percent had CGI-I ambulation scores that reflected significant improvement, and 45% demonstrated insignificant improvement or worse outcomes. There was no evidence of a significant association between the total Radscale score and CGI-I scores after VPS; nor was there evidence of a significant association between the Radscale sub-scores and CGI-I outcomes.

Conclusions:

This study suggests both total and sub-scores of the iNPH Radscale ratings based on pre-VPS placement imaging have no clear association with clinical improvement after VPS placement. Further research is needed to identify preoperative parameters that are predictive of positive shunt response.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000203754