Telehealth Utilization in a Comprehensive Multiple Sclerosis Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single Center Experience
Trieste Francis1, Sama Noroozi Gilandehi1, Sarah Shapiro2, Yiren Sun3, Melissa Wright1, Sarah Germaine1, Jonathan Galli1, Robert Kadish1, Julia Klein1, L DeWitt1, Tammy Smith1, M. Paz Soldan1, Stacey Clardy1, Ka-Ho Wong1, John Rose1
1University of Utah, 2Kansas City University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 33. BIPOC+ Next Generation Neuroscience Research Initiative
Objective:

Describe telehealth utilization and metrics of patient care in a comprehensive multiple sclerosis (MS) Clinic during three distinct phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background:

Routine clinical evaluations are vital for effective disease and symptom management in MS. In March 2020, Covid-19 pandemic policy required rapid implementation of a remote telehealth model, which has since become an integrated part of many clinics. Published studies on the impact of telehealth implementation in MS patient care largely focus on patient satisfaction and feasibility rather than objective metrics of patient care and disease progression.

Design/Methods:

A retrospective chart analysis was conducted at the University of Utah from March 2019 to February 2022. Data was divided into three commensurate study periods: pre-pandemic (MAR2019-FEB2020), height of the pandemic (MAR2020-FEB2021), and stable pandemic (MAR2021-FEB2022). Basic demographics, timed-25-foot-walk (T25FW), mobility status, clinical relapses, and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and steroids were included in the analysis. 

Results:

Total number of neurology visits did not significantly differ between the three study periods. Of the 100 MS patients included in the study: 73 were female, with mean age 53 (23-81) years with an average BMI of 29.5 Kg/m2. 65 patients performed walking tests unassisted, 26 with assistance (cane/walker), and 9 were wheelchair-bound. The average T25FW measured pre-pandemic was 7.1 s (n=94) and 7.2 s (n=80) measured during the stable pandemic period. 24 MS relapses in 19 patients treated with IV steroids were identified during the study. 43 instances of DMT change in 40 patients were recorded: 19 changes during the pre-pandemic period, 14 during the height of the pandemic period, and 10 during the stable pandemic period. 21 patients were not on DMT.

Conclusions:
Telehealth  can be an effective  method to care for MS patients during a pandemic. In this cohort, objective measures did not differ amongst patients with implementation of telehealth.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000203607