Localizing Delirium through Automated Lesion Segmentation and Neural Network Mapping
John Rhee1, Michael Ferguson2, Anna Bonkhoff3, Jay Patel4, Martin Bretzner5, Sungmin Hong6, Sophia Ryan7, Brandon Westover4, Michael Fox8, Natalia Rost4, Eyal Kimchi9
1Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, 2Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 4Massachusetts General Hospital, 5Mass General Brigham, 6MGH, 7Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham, Harvard, 8Brigham and Women's Hospital / Harvard Medical School, 9Northwestern University
Objective:

To determine whether delirium in acute ischemic stroke is localizable to specific neural networks.

Background:

Delirium is estimated to occur in one-fourth of patients with acute stroke. Despite its associated morbidity and mortality, prediction and pathophysiological understanding of delirium remains challenging. A recent meta-analysis of patients with delirium and stroke found increased risks of delirium in supratentorial, cortical, and anterior circulation strokes, raising the possibility of an underlying neural network for delirium. 

Design/Methods:

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center with acute ischemic stroke from January 2016 to April 2019. Patients were assessed for delirium by trained clinical nursing staff using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) framework. Acute stroke lesions from MRI diffusion weighted images (DWI) lesions were automatically segmented using a machine learning algorithm. Lesions were registered to a 2mm Montreal Neurological Institute template (MNI-152). We then used lesion network mapping to identify potential unifying brain networks for delirium in patients with acute stroke.

Results:

907 scans from unique patients were analyzed. 274 patients had delirium (30.2%), 47.5% were women (431), and the mean age was 69.6 years old. In comparison to a general stroke cohort, patients with delirium had lesions connected to the right and left inferior frontal gyri and left middle temporal gyrus and left temporo-parietal junction (one-sample t-test, family-wise error p<0.05). Sensitivity analysis showed that delirium was not associated with parietal, occipital, brainstem, and cerebellar lesions.

Conclusions:
Delirium in stroke localizes to a network connected to frontotemporal regions. These results have implications for prediction of delirium in patients with acute stroke, with the potential for targeting multimodal prevention. Future work will refine their specificity, however, the results suggest that frontotemporal networks may be particularly important for cardinal symptoms of delirium, a disorder of impaired attention and awareness
10.1212/WNL.0000000000203110