Exploratory Delayed-Start Analysis Of PASADENA Part 3 52-Week OLE Evaluating Prasinezumab Efficacy On Motor Progression And Complications In Early-Stage PD
Gennaro Pagano1, Stefano Zanigni2, Annabelle Monnet2, Kirsten Taylor1, Andrea Hahn3, Tanya Simuni4, Kenneth Marek5, Ronald Postuma6, Nicola Pavese7, Fabrizio Stocchi8, Hanno Svoboda1, Paulo Fontoura2, Rachelle Doody2, Geoffrey Kerchner1, Azad Bonni1, Tania Nikolcheva2
1Roche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 2F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, 3Excelya Germany GmbH, 4Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicien, 5Invicro, A Konica Minolta Company, 6Neurology, McGill University, Montreal Neurological Institute, 7Clinical Ageing Research Unit, Newcastle University, 8Institute for Research and Medical Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana
Objective:

Here, we describe the results of PASADENA Part 2 at Week 104 and Part 3 Week 52 open-label extension (OLE).

Background:

Prasinezumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody designed to target aggregated alpha-synuclein and slow disease progression in Parkinson’s disease (PD). PASADENA (NCT03100149) is multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of prasinezumab in participants with early-stage PD.

Design/Methods:

Participants with early-stage PD (diagnosis ≤2 years of age at screening; Hoehn & Yahr Stages I–II) were randomised to receive intravenous prasinezumab every 4 weeks (1500 mg or 4500 mg) for approximately three years (early-start group), or placebo for 52 weeks followed by prasinezumab (1500 mg or 4500 mg) for approximately two years (delayed-start group). All 316 PASADENA participants were considered in the analysis, with participants included regardless of change in symptomatic therapy. Motor progression and motor complications were defined, respectively, as a ≥5-point increase on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III and reaching a score ≥1 point on MDS-UPDRS Part IV, and were analysed using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results:

Baseline characteristics were balanced between individuals in the early- and delayed-start groups. At the end of Part 2, fewer participants in the early-start group showed motor progression (80.1%) or developed motor complications (45.0%) compared with the delayed-start group (89.5% and 55.2%) (hazard ratio: 0.77 [80% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.91] and 0.74 [80% CI 0.60–0.92]). One-year results from Part 3 will be further described.

Conclusions:

The PASADENA Part 3 OLE is currently ongoing, and we aim to describe the long-term safety and efficacy on a yearly basis.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000202913