Efficacy and Safety Profile of Cladribine Tablets in an Italian Real-Life Cohort of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Monocentric Longitudinal Observational Study
Chiara Zanetta1, Maria Rocca3, Alessandro Meani2, Paolo Preziosa5, Vittorio Martinelli1, Laura Ferrè1, Lucia Moiola1, Massimo Filippi4
1Neurology Unit, 2Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 3Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, anad Neurology Unit, 4Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation Unit, and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 5Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Objective:

To report real-world findings about efficacy and safety of cladribine (CLAD) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), identifying predictors of response.

Background:

CLAD induces a transient lymphocyte depletion followed by immune reconstitution, with improved immune tolerance. Real-world data on CLAD performance and its predictors of response are limited.

Design/Methods:

Monocentric, observational, real-world study on pwMS who started CLAD from April 2018 to November 2021, with a minimum 6 month-follow-up.

Results:

Our population comprised 114 pwMS, 71.9% females, 50% naïves, mean age 33.0 years, median disease duration 3.0 years, median baseline EDSS 2.0, mean 1 and 2 year-baseline ARR 1.3 and 1.2. Median follow-up: 23.8 months.  4.4% and 30.7% patients presented relapses and MRI activity in the first 6 months. When considering data re-baselined towards month 6, 12 relapses were reported. 84% (CI 76-92) and 76% (CI 67-87) patients had no MRI activity at 12 and 24 months, respectively. At month 24, NEDA-3 status was reached by 69% of naïves, and 81% and 55% of switchers from low and high-efficacy treatments, respectively. Eleven patients switched to other treatments. Younger age (HR 0.94, CI: 0.89-0.99, p=0.011), baseline EDSS score > 3.0 (HR 4.29, CI: 1.83-10.05, p=0.0008) and gadolinium-enhancing lesion count > 4 (HR 2.24, CI: 0.95-5.26, p=0.065) were risk factors for loss of NEDA-3. 20.0% of pwMS referred side effects: skin rash, fever/infections, fatigue. Lymphopenia was more likely at months 3 and 15. No grade-4 lymphopenia cases were observed.

Conclusions:

CLAD is more effective when placed early in the treatment algorithm: naïves or switchers from lower efficacy drugs seem to benefit more. Baseline age, disability and gadolinium-enhancing lesions are risk factors for loss of NEDA-3. CLAD was overall well tolerated. Real-world data on larger populations with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our findings.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000202398