Long-term Follow-up of Cipaglucosidase Alfa/Miglustat in Ambulatory Patients with Pompe Disease: An Open-label Phase I/II Study (ATB200-02)
Tahseen Mozaffar1, Benedikt Schoser2, Priya Kishnani3, Drago Bratkovic4, Paula R. Clemens5, Ozlem Goker-Alpan6, Xue Ming7, Mark Roberts8, Kumaraswamy Sivakumar9, Ans Van Der Ploeg10, Mitchell Goldman11, Jacquelyn Wright11, Fred Holdbrook11, Vipul Jain11, Sheela Sitaraman11, Yasmine Wasfi11, Barry Byrne12
1University of California, Irvine, 2Friedrich-Baur-Institut, Neurologische Klinik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 3Duke University Medical Center, 4PARC Research Clinic, Royal Adelaide Hospital, 5Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Division Chief, Neurology, Medical Service Line, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, 6Lysosomal and Rare Disorders Research and Treatment Center, 7Department of Neurology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 8Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, 9Neuromuscular Clinic and Research Center, 10Erasmus MC University Medical Center, 11Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., 12University of Florida
Objective:

The ongoing ATB200-02 (NCT02675465), open-label, Phase I/II clinical trial aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat in adults with Pompe disease.

Background:

Cipaglucosidase alfa/miglustat is an investigational, two-component therapy for Pompe disease. We report data up to 48 months for 6‑minute walk distance (6MWD) and % predicted sitting forced vital capacity (FVC) for ATB200‑02.

Design/Methods:

Three adult ambulatory cohorts - two enzyme replacement therapy (ERT)-experienced (2–6 years [n=11] and ≥7 years [n=6]) and one ERT-naïve (n=6) - received 20 mg/kg intravenous-infused cipaglucosidase alfa plus 260 mg miglustat orally biweekly in an ongoing study. Changes from baseline (CFBL) in multiple endpoints were assessed at intervals. We report data from 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months.

Results:

Baseline characteristics represented the Pompe disease population. Durable improvements occurred at 6, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months in 6MWD (m): pooled analyses of ERT-experienced cohorts, mean(±SD) CFBL: 23.1(±44.75), n=16; 33.5(±49.62), n=16; 25.2(±63.30), n=13; 9.8(±85.98), n=12; 20.7(±101.84), n=9, respectively; ERT-naïve cohort: 36.7(±29.08), n=6; 57.0(±29.96), n=6; 54.4(±36.18), n=6; 43.5(±45.19), n=5; 52.2(±46.59), n=4, respectively. FVC (%) was stable or improved in ERT-experienced cohorts, mean(±SD) CFBL: −0.9(±8.59), n=16; −1.2(±5.95), n=16; 1.0(±7.96), n=13; −0.3(±6.68), n=10; 1.0(±6.42), n=6, respectively, and improved in the ERT-naïve cohort: 4.2(±5.04), n=6; 3.2(±8.42), n=6; 4.7(±5.09), n=6; 6.2(±3.35), n=5; 8.3(±4.50), n=4, respectively. Over 48 months, serum CK and urine Hex4 biomarkers improved in ERT-experienced and ERT-naïve cohorts.

Conclusions:

In ATB200-02, ERT-experienced cohorts had durable mean improvements (CFBL) in motor function that were sustained up to 48 months of follow-up; respiratory function was stable and maintained over the same period. The ERT-naïve cohort showed durable mean improvements (CFBL) in motor and respiratory function that were sustained up to 48 months of follow-up. Biomarker outcomes were consistent with other efficacy results. The overall safety profile for ambulatory cohorts was similar to approved ERT. Supported by Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000202282