Can a Single Acute Ischemic Stroke Simulation Course Facilitate Mastery?
Casey Albin1, Erika Sigman1, Melissa Perkagis2, Nirav Bhatt1, Spencer Hutto1, Sitara Koneru1, Ehizele Osehobo1, Joaquin Vizcarra1, Nicholas Morris2
1Emory University School of Medicine, 2University of Maryland School of Medicine
Objective:

To assess the impact of an acute ischemic stroke (AIS) simulation course on residents’ performance, confidence, and knowledge.

Background:

Previous studies have demonstrated that simulation can promote mastery learning in non-stroke neurological emergencies.

Design/Methods:

We designed an AIS simulation course with three independent scenarios based on previously reported consensus. For each scenario a Minimum Passing Score (MPS) and Mastery Score (MS) was determined by the Angoff method. Thirteen junior neurology residents completed a 20-point knowledge test and 7-point Likert scale confidence survey about AIS before the course and after didactic teaching. A week later, each resident participated in a scored AIS case and then practiced stroke care in second unscored case. Residents again completed the knowledge and confidence assessments. Several weeks later, without notice, each resident was evaluated in a third AIS scenario. 

 

For comparison, eight senior residents completed the knowledge test, confidence survey, and the third acute stroke case. 

 

Pre-post and between groups comparisons were conducted using paired t-tests and independent t-tests, respectively.

Results:

Junior residents scored better on the knowledge test after the didactic session (mean score pre: 40% to post: 52.2%, p<0.05), but only 3 (23%) initially achieved the MPS score in the first AIS simulation. After the simulation course, 9 junior residents (69%) achieved the MPS threshold. Although none achieved Mastery, junior residents’ mean score in the simulation improved (10.3 (SD=2.8) vs 15.7 (SD=2.6), p<0.001) and their confidence increased (pre mean=3.3 (SD=1.9) vs. post mean =4.9 (SD=1.2), p< 0.001). 

 

Eight seniors completed the simulation: five reached MPS (63%) and one achieved Mastery. The simulation scores of the post-course juniors and seniors were similar (mean=15.7 (SD=2.6) vs mean=16.0 (SD=2.5), p=0.793).

Conclusions:

This pilot study suggests that a brief AIS simulation course may improves junior residents’ performance and confidence to a level similar to senior residents, but not to mastery.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000202140