Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Myelopathy: A Monocentric Experience at a Specialized Center
Clare Lambert1, Patricia Redondo1, David Acero-Garces1, Asli Buyukkurt1, Daniela Riveros Acosta1, Andrea Cepeda1, Scott Newsome1, Carlos Pardo-Villamizar1
1Johns Hopkins Hospital, Dept of Neurology
Objective:
Characterize functional outcomes of patients with myelopathy/myelitis after long-term clinical follow-up. 
Background:

Neuroimmunologists play a crucial role in caring for patients with non-traumatic spinal cord disease and there is a need to better understanding the long-term clinical outcomes in this population, particularly in the context of aging.  

Design/Methods:

We performed retrospective chart review of a cohort of patients followed for more than a decade at our Myelopathy and Myelitis Center, including clinical, imaging, and biomarker information, to establish markers of functional outcomes at symptom nadir, at the first visit to our center, and after >10 years of follow-up. 

Results:

We analyzed 86 patients. Mean age at myelopathy onset was 45.2+/-12.8 years, with a mean follow-up of 159.2+/-34.1 months. Half had a monophasic course, 34% were relapsing, and 16% were progressive. Over half of patients had a demyelinating etiology, and the remainder had diagnostic categories of rheumatologic (including neurosarcoidosis), infectious, vascular, structural, or idiopathic/unknown. 53% of patients were employed full-time prior to symptom onset; at last follow-up, 19% were employed and 21% were retired. The median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was 2 (IQR=2-3) at nadir and 2 (IQR=1-3) at last follow-up. Data regarding bowel and bladder symptoms, weakest limb strength, and gait metrics were also obtained. 

Conclusions:

Patients experience a variable course of recovery after myelopathy or myelitis. While many patients improve anecdotally, at a group level, they often remain with some degree of residual disability over a decade after their symptom nadir. 

Generative AI Usage
No, did not use generative AI in the drafting or editing in this abstract.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.