International Delphi Survey of Clinical Practice in Stiff Person Syndrome and Related Disorders: Treatment and Monitoring
Yoji Hoshina1, Ka-Ho Wong2, Sadie McGreer1, Justin Abbatemarco3, Bettina Balint4, Kyle Blackburn5, Stefan Blum6, Adrian Budhram7, Marinos Dalakas8, Josep Dalmau9, Livia Dutra10, Francesc Graus9, Jerome Honnorat11, Takahiro Iizuka12, Sarosh Irani13, Saiju Jacob14, Eric Lancaster15, Jenny Linnoila16, Alfonso Lopez13, Sara Mariotto17, Naoko Matsui18, Andrew McKeon13, Joao Moura19, Scott Newsome20, Orna O'Toole21, Amanda Piquet22, Amy Quek23, Albert Saiz24, Mateus Simabukuro25, Claudia Sommer26, Maarten Titulaer27, Alberto Vogrig28, Yujie Wang29, Tara Zier30, Jacqueline Kraska30, Giovanna Manzano31, Anastasia Zekeridou32, Stacey Clardy33
1University of Utah Health, 2U of U Neurology Clinic, 3Cleveland Clinic, 4University Hospital of Zurich, 5University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 6Princess Alexandra Hospital, 7London Health Sciences Centre, 8Thomas Jefferson University, 9IDIBAPS, 10Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, 11Hospices Civils de Lyon, 12Department of Neurology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 13Mayo Clinic, 14University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, 15The University of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Neurology, 16University Neurology Associates, UPMC, 17Neurology Unit, University of Verona, 18Tokushima University, 19Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, 20Johns Hopkins Hospital, 21Mercy University Hospital, 22University of Colorado, 23National University Hospital, 24Hospital Clinico De Barcelona, 25Hospital Das Clinicas, Sao Paulo U Scho of Med, 26Neurologische Klinik der Universitat, 27Erasmus Medical Center, 28University of Udine, 29UW Northwest, 30The Stiff Person Syndrome Research Foundation, 31University of California Irvine, 32Neuroimmunology Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 33University of Utah
Objective:
To establish expert consensus and identify practice variation in treatment and monitoring approaches for stiff person syndrome (SPS) and related disorders.

Background:
International consensus guidance on the treatment  and monitoring of SPS and related disorders is lacking, and management approaches may vary across centers, countries, and resource settings.

Design/Methods:
Forty international experts in SPS were identified based on peer-reviewed authorship. A modified Delphi survey was designed to evaluate agreement on treatment and monitoring. Consensus was predefined as greater than 80% agreement.
Results:
Of 40 invited expert clinicians, 33 (83%) from 15 countries participated. Consensus was achieved for a 2-pronged treatment approach combining symptomatic therapy and immunotherapy in SPS. Consensus was also reached for benzodiazepines as first-line symptomatic treatment; adjunctive baclofen and botulinum toxin in selected patients; avoidance of opioids; use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as first-line acute immunotherapy and first-line maintenance immunotherapy; plasma exchange for refractory or acutely worsening disease; individualized maintenance IVIg adjustment and tapering after sustained stability; rituximab for partial or nonresponders to IVIg; immunotherapy as the cornerstone of treatment for progressive encephalomyelitis with rigidity and myoclonus (PERM) and glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65)-associated cerebellar ataxia and epilepsy; the preferred role of rituximab in glycine receptor alpha1 antibody-associated PERM; concomitant antiseizure therapy for seizure phenotypes; consideration of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for selected SPS patients; monitoring using objective functional measures; psychiatric screening; and diagnostic reassessment at follow-up. Consensus was not reached after Round 1 regarding initial IVIg dose and interval strategies, the use of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, pregnancy-specific treatment strategies, and several adjunctive symptomatic therapies.
Conclusions:
This international Delphi survey helps identify areas of expert agreement and variation in the treatment and monitoring of SPS and related disorders across diverse clinical settings. These findings, supplemented by the round 2 data, may help inform future consensus recommendations.
Generative AI Usage
No, did not use generative AI in the drafting or editing in this abstract.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.