Efficacy and Safety of Crisugabalin in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Central Neuropathic Pain: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Xiaochong Fan1, Youxiang Cui2, Yufeng Tang3, Bo Liu4, Songbo Li5, Yangkun Chen5, Qinglai Wang6, Yaming Li7, Shiyu Yan7, Qiuyue Pan7, Dongsheng Fan8
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 2Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine, 3Mianyang Central Hospital, 4The First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, 5The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), 6Wenzhou TCM Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 7Haisco Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., 8Peking University Third Hospital
Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of crisugabalin in patients with moderate-to-severe central neuropathic pain (cNP).

Background:

CNP, such as pain following spinal cord injury (SCI) or stroke, severely impairs life quality and presents a significant therapeutic challenge due to limited optimal treatments. Crisugabalin, a novel third-generation calcium channel α2δ-1 subunit ligand approved in China, offers rapid onset and doesn’t require dose titration in peripheral neuropathic pain (pNP).

Design/Methods:

In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial (NCT06422117), 408 cNP patients were randomized to crisugabalin (20-40 mg BID) or placebo for 12 weeks in China. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in Average Daily Pain Score (ADPS) at Week 12.

Results:

At Week 12, crisugabalin demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in ADPS change from baseline versus placebo in the overall population (LS mean difference: -2.39 vs. -1.15; p<0.0001) and subgroups (SCI: -2.48 vs. -1.20, p<0.0001; post-stroke -2.32 vs. -1.07, p<0.0001) in FAS. PPS results were consistent. There was a significant ADPS reduction starting from Week 1. ADPS response rates were significantly higher with crisugabalin for both ≥30% and ≥50% pain reduction in the overall population and subgroups (all p<0.01). Improvements in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Average Daily Sleep Interference Scale (ADSIS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), Chinese Profile of Mood State (POMS-C), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) all significantly favored crisugabalin (all p<0.01). Treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were mostly mild to moderate and needed no additional treatment; the most common were dizziness, somnolence, and peripheral edema, with incidence comparable to placebo. No new safety signals emerged.

Conclusions:

Crisugabalin significantly reduced pain, improved sleep, mood and quality of life with a well-tolerated safety profiles in cNP patients. These results support crisugabalin as an effective and safe therapeutic option for cNP patients.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217900
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.