Title: Resource Optimization and Improved Door-to-puncture Times Through FAST-ED Score-based Neurointerventional Team Activation: A County-wide Retrospective Analysis
Teneille Geib1, Brett Meyer1, Ananya Banerjee1, Scott Pannell1, Theresa Angeles1, Melody Dotson1, Kimberly Meirick1, Ann Hoover1, Chandeep Sharda1, Marissa D'Souza1, Gina Humphrey1, Vanessa Samuelson1, Jeffrey Steinberg1, David Santiago-Dieppa1, Maranda Bradshaw1, Jennifer Harris1, Lovella Hailey1, Royya Modir2, Thomas Hemmen1
1UC San Diego Health, 2UC san diego health
Objective:

Objective: Evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary process improvements and FAST-ED score stratification on neurointerventional team activation, resource optimization and decreasing neurointerventional thrombectomy times.

Background:

Background: Timely intervention in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is essential for improving outcomes. Activating neurointerventional resources in non-large vessel occlusion (LVO) cases can create inefficiencies. The FAST-ED score, a validated prehospital tool for predicting LVOs, offers a way to streamline team mobilization and reduce Door to Puncture times.

Design/Methods:

Methods: FAST-ED scores were added to initial stroke code pages. Viz.ai’s AI platform converted pre-hospital alerts into “pager cards.” Scores ≥5 prompted core stroke team members to expand the card to include neurointerventional radiology (NIR). If CTA ruled out LVO, the team was stood down via the same card. Countermeasures included:

  • Revised Policies, EMS Stroke Code process, incorporated FAST-ED and Viz.ai-LVO pathways
  • Targeted education for MICNs, telecom, ED, and neurology staff
  • Mock stroke codes at two campuses
  • Multi-source data collection
  • FAST-ED score integration into EPIC for streamlined abstraction
Results:

Results: FAST-ED score stratification enabled targeted activation of neurointerventional teams, avoiding unnecessary mobilization in 122 true negative cases (FAST-ED≤4 AND no LVO). The collective countermeasures led to a 37.61% reduction in median door-to-puncture time (113 to 71 minutes, resulting in a statistically significant, p<0.0001. FAST-ED score performance metrics were: True Negatives (TN) = 122, True Positives (TP) = 5, False Positive (FP) =6, False Negatives (FN) = 1, yielding a sensitivity of 83.33% and specificity of 95.31%.

Conclusions:

Conclusion: Integrating FAST-ED scoring into EMS and hospital workflows improved procedural efficiency and resource utilization. Avoiding neurointerventional activation for FAST-ED scores ≤4 reduced unnecessary team mobilization. This may have  contributed to the 37.61% decrease in door-to-puncture times. This model demonstrates a replicable framework for stroke systems to enhance operational efficiency through data-driven triage and activation protocols.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217851
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.