Gregory Day1, Scott Przybelski5, Manoj Jain2, Christian Lachner1, Yoav Piura1, Paula Aduen3, Leah Schecter4, Angela Fought5, Patricia Diaz Galvan9, Val Lowe6, Christopher Schwarz7, Ronald Petersen8, Bradley Boeve8, Kejal Kantarci7, Neill Graff-Radford1
1Neurology, 2Radiology, 3Psychology, 4Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic in Florida, 5Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, 6Nuclear Medicine, 7Center for Advanced Imaging Research, 8Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 9Institute of Biomedicine of Seville
Objective:
Determine whether tau-PET findings generalize to Black and Latino participants who continue to be underrepresented in dementia research.
Background:
Tau-PET neuroimaging is increasingly used to diagnose, stage, and assess response to disease-modifying treatments in individuals with Alzheimer disease, yet studies evaluating tau PET applications have predominantly been completed in non-Hispanic White (nHW) participants.
Design/Methods:
Community-dwelling Black and Latino participants completed MRI, and amyloid- (PiB or florbetapir) and tau- (flortaucipir) PET brain imaging as part of a longitudinal study of memory and aging. Global and regional tau-PET standardized uptake value ratios (normalized to the cerebellar crus) were determined in Black and Latino participants and compared with findings in nHW participants, 1:1-matched for age, sex, education, and global Clinical Dementia Rating®. Conditional logistic modeling compared 47 regions of interest, adjusted for false discovery rate. Relevant associations between flortaucipir retention and clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman rank correlations.
Results:
105 Black (mean 71.3±11.0 years-old, 65% female, 34% cognitively impaired), 37 Latino (mean 65.2±8.2 -years-old, 51% female, 22% cognitively impaired) and 142 matched nHW participants completed neuroimaging. Tau-PET burden was similar between matched cohorts (Black and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.37±0.41 vs 1.32±0.36, p=0.20; Latino and nHW participants, mean SUVR: 1.30±0.41 vs 1.27±0.29, p=0.69). Lower flortaucipir uptake was noted in the caudate (p=0.02), putamen (p=0.03), and pallidum (p=0.02) of Black vs nHW participants. Global flortaucipir retention increased with age (Black: Rho=0.223; nHW: Rho=0.243; p<0.05), amyloid Centiloids (Black: Rho=0.649; Latino: Rho=0.474; nHW: Rho=0.693; p<0.01), and cognitive impairment (i.e., Clinical Dementia Rating® Sum-of-Box scores, Black: Rho=0.53; Latino: Rho=0.489; nHW: Rho=0.533; p<0.01).
Conclusions:
Tau-PET patterns were similar across ethnoracial groups, with flortaucipir retention increasing with age, amyloid accumulation, and the severity of cognitive impairment. These findings affirm the clinical and research applications of tau PET in diverse cohorts.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.