The Incidence of Spreading Depolarizations in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Detected by Depth Electrocorticography During Clinical Multimodal Neuromonitoring
Brandon Foreman1, Davis Ewbank2, Gabrielle Dent1, Rudy Luna1, Brittany Kasturiarachi1, Laura Ngwenya1, Jed Hartings1
1University of Cincinnati, 2University of Oklahoma
Objective:

To determine the incidence of spreading depolarizations (SD) detected using clinical depth electrocorticography (dECOG) in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

Background:

SD are a signature pathomechanism of secondary brain injury and occur commonly after sTBI. The gold standard for recording SD involves operative placement of a strip electrode. Bedside multimodality neuromonitoring (MNM) strategies include dECOG in patients who do not undergo craniectomy. The incidence of SD detected by dECOG has not been reported.

Design/Methods:

A retrospective review of patients with sTBI undergoing MNM, including dECOG, over a 6-year period. Patients with or without contralateral hemicraniectomy and/or strip ECOG were included. The incidence of SD was quantified along with relationships to 3-6 month functional outcome.

Results:

There were n=160 patients monitored with dECOG; 5 had uninterpretable recordings. Patients were 41+/-18 years of age and 124 (80%) were male. Hemicraniectomy was performed in 70 patients (45%); a strip electrode was placed in 23/74 (35%).  Patients were monitored a median of 82 hours (interquartile range 58-124 hours). SD were detected by dECOG in 21/155 (14%) and Sz in 10/155 (6.5%). Of those with strip ECOG, SD were recorded in 16/23 (70%) and Sz in 5/23 (22%). Of patients with dECOG SD, 14/21 (67%) died or remained in a state of unresponsive wakefulness vs 53/134 patients without SD (40%; p=0.04). While numbers were limited, those with strip SD similarly exhibited worse outcome (10/16 [63%] of those with strip SD vs 2/7 [29%] without strip SD).

Conclusions:

SD were detected using dECOG in 14% of patients undergoing multimodality neuromonitoring. Relative to strip ECOG monitoring, the lower incidence of SD using dECOG may reflect smaller spatial sampling and the lack of targeted peri-injury placement. However, the prognostic significance of SD detection remains similar, with worse functional outcome when SD are detected in either dECOG or strip ECOG.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217347
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.