Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Insomnia: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Lucia Belen Varela1, Joselyn MiƱo Zambrano2, Camila Escobar Liquitay3, Brenda Maura Goncalves Costa4, Guilherme Santos Marques da Silva4, Samanta Diaz Menai3, Nicolas Meza5, Luis Garegnani3
1Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Neurology, University of Manitoba, 2Fleni, 3Cochrane associated Centre UHIBA, 4University Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, 5Universidad de Valparaiso
Objective:

This study evaluates the effects of medical cannabis on adults with insomnia.


Background:
Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder. Traditional treatments can cause dependence and cognitive issues, prompting interest in medical cannabis (MC).
Design/Methods:
We conducted a Cochrane review (protocol https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD016216), searching until April 2025. Included RCTs involving adults with insomnia comparing MC with placebo or other drugs. Outcomes included sleep quality, total sleep time (TST), adverse events, sleep onset latency (SOL), wake after sleep onset (WASO), daytime functioning, withdrawal symptoms and quality of life (QoL). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. When feasible, we performed a meta-analysis, using RR for dichotomous outcomes and MD or SMD for continuous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was appraised with GRADE.
Results:
We included nine studies (two parallel RCTs and seven crossover RCTs) with a total of 540 participants. Eight studies compared MC with placebo, and one compared it with amitriptyline. Most had an overall high risk of bias. MC may have little to no effect on sleep quality (SMD -0.58, IC95% -1.23 to 0.08), QoL (SMD 0.84, IC95% -0.61 to 2.29), and daytime functioning (SMD -0.34, IC95% -0.83 to 0.16) with a very low certainty. MC may have little to no effect on TST (MD 7.86, CI95% -23.04 to 38.39), WASO (MD -2.79, CI95% -34.40 to 28.82), and SOL (MD -4.30, CI95% -26.82 to 18.22). We could not meta-analyze adverse events due to insufficient information. One study reported withdrawal symptoms, but had no cases in either group.
Conclusions:
The studies analyzed to date suggest that MC has little or no effect on adult insomnia outcomes, with very low certainty of evidence. It´s recommended that, based on these preliminary analyses, further RCTs are required to address methodological limitations.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000217296
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.