Defining Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Early Multiple Sclerosis
Taha Ayaz1, Ahmed Serkan Emekli1, Tuncay Gunduz1, Murat Kurtuncu1
1Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Objective:

Progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) and relapse-associated worsening (RAW) are primary mechanisms of irreversible disability accumulation in multiple sclerosis (MS). Various PIRA definitions have been proposed, limiting cross-study comparability. We aimed to determine a clinically applicable PIRA definition by analyzing 18 different models using real-world data.

Background:

Inconsistent PIRA definitions hamper comparative research and meta-analyses. Most existing studies rely on clinical trial data rather than real-world populations. Systematic comparison of detection methodologies is needed to establish evidence-based standardization.

Design/Methods:

We included 392 relapsing-remitting MS patients meeting 2017 McDonald criteria, examined within one year of disease onset, with ≥2 years follow-up. We developed an algorithm enriching longitudinal EDSS data at 90-day intervals. Eighteen PIRA detection models were systematically compared across three parameters: (1) confirmation time (6 months, 12 months, end-of-follow-up), (2) confirmation type (threshold-based vs. absolute), and (3) relapse-free criteria (90 days post-relapse, no relapses baseline-to-worsening, no relapses baseline-to-confirmation). Annualized PIRA rates (APR) were calculated as events per patient-year.

Results:

Among 392 patients (257 female, 135 male), median follow-up was 6.4 years (IQR: 7.0) and median age at disease onset was 26.4 years (IQR: 11.3). During up to 5 years of follow-up (1,592.5 patient-years), PIRA incidence ranged from 2.0% to 9.9% across definitions, while APR ranged from 0.0057 to 0.0270 events per patient-year. Relapse-free criteria showed the largest effect on PIRA detection (relative impact 72.3%), while confirmation time and type showed 50.6% and 4.0% impacts. For clinical practice, we identified a model using 12-month threshold-based confirmation with baseline-to-worsening relapse-free criteria as the most applicable. This model yielded 4.3% PIRA incidence, 7.7% RAW incidence, and APR of 0.0126.

Conclusions:

We propose 12-month threshold-based confirmation with baseline-to-worsening relapse-free criteria as the most clinically applicable PIRA definition in early MS. This model can contribute to more consistent and comparable PIRA detection in clinical practice.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217295
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.