Discontinuation and Non-publication of Dementia Clinical Studies: A Cross-sectional Analysis
Yousef Alnomani1
1Faculty of Medicine Benha University
Objective:

This study evaluates the characteristics of clinical studies on dementia to identify the reasons behind early discontinuation and non-publication, aiming to prevent these issues in the future.

Background:
Clinical studies on dementia are vulnerable to discontinuation and non-publication, representing significant sources of research waste in clinical medicine.
Design/Methods:

We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for all clinical studies related to dementia up to September 2025. Data on enrollment, study location, Funder type, and intervention type were extracted and analyzed using binomial logistic regression.

Results:

A total of 3,787 eligible registered clinical studies were included in the analysis. Of these, 3,266 (86.2%) were completed, and 521 (13.8%) were discontinued. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis identified several significant predictors:

- Studies with small sample sizes (fewer than 100 participants) were significantly more likely to be discontinued (OR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.44–0.72], P < 0.001).

- Studies conducted at a single location were more likely to be completed than those conducted at multiple locations (OR = 1.45, 95% CI [1.14–1.85], P = 0.003).

- Studies with industrial funding were more likely to be discontinued compared to those with non-industrial funding (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.58–0.996], P = 0.046).

- studies Included only males were more likely to be completed than studies included both gender (OR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.22–0.99], P = 0.047).

Conclusions:

There is evidence of non-dissemination bias in clinical studies of dementia. This bias raises ethical concerns about exposing volunteer participants to potential risks without advancing medical knowledge.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217225
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.