Prevalent Gabapentinoid Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Julianne Brooks1, Rebeka Bustamante Rocha1, Maria Donahue1, Madhav Sankaranarayanan2, Christine Ritchie1, Sebastien Haneuse2, Alexander Tsai1, Lidia Maria Moura1
1Massachusetts General Hospital, 2Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Objective:
To estimate the prevalence and correlates of gabapentinoid prescriptions among older adults presenting with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
Background:
Little is known about patterns of gabapentinoid use among older adults hospitalized for stroke, who are more vulnerable to side effects.
Design/Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 2009-2022 claims data from a 20% sample of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older hospitalized for AIS. We included patients without prior stroke enrolled in traditional Medicare Parts A, B, D coverage for 12 or more months before hospitalization. We analyzed gabapentinoid prescription claims 6 months prior to AIS hospitalization, estimating prevalent users by year, U.S. census division, and age group.
Results:
Among 271,011 beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS between 2009 and 2022, 32,237 (11.9% [95% CI: 11.8 – 12.0]) had gabapentinoid prescription claims prior to hospitalization. Median age was 79 (Quartile Range: 73 – 86), 60% were women, and 80% were Non-Hispanic White. Prevalent gabapentinoid users increased from 8.5% [95% CI: 8.2 – 8.9] in 2009 to 13.7% [95% CI: 13.0 – 14.5] in 2022. The largest prevalence rate difference between U.S. Census divisions was observed for the Mid-Atlantic (9.4% [95% CI: 9.1 – 9.7]) division vs. the East South-Central division (14.9% [95% CI: 14.5 – 15.4]). Prevalent gabapentinoid use decreased with advancing age group, with 15.6% [95% CI: 15.2 – 15.9] prevalent use among 65-69 year-olds and 9.6% [95% CI: 9.4 – 9.8] among 85+ year-olds.
Conclusions:
Many Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for AIS were using gabapentinoids preadmission. The prevalence rate increased between 2009 and 2022 and varied significantly by geographic region.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.