Community-based Brain Health Screening Through Portable MRI and Brain-age Modeling
Hailey Brigger1, Ian Johnson1, Annabelle Shanks1, Steph Maynez1, Alison Champagne1, Cyprien Rivier1, Megan Johnson2, Matt De Both2, Danielle Metz2, Darian Chambers2, Calla Price2, Yareli Barraza2, Bethine Moore2, Ignazio Piras2, Arjun Agrawal2, Jua Iglesias Gonzalez3, Annabel Sorby-Adams4, W. Kimberly4, Adam De Havenon1, Matthew Huentelman2, Kevin Sheth1
1Department of Neurology, Center for Brain & Mind Health, Yale New Haven Hospital and Yale School of Medicine, 2Early Detection and Prevention, The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), 3Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 4Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Objective:

To develop a portable MRI brain-age model for community brain health screening and examine its associations with vascular risk factors.

Background:

Brain-age modeling estimates biological brain age from MRI-derived volumes, providing a quantitative marker of neurovascular health. Portable MRI (pMRI) enables imaging outside of traditional hospital settings, offering opportunities for large-scale, accessible brain health screening. By integrating pMRI with data-driven modeling, we aimed to establish a scalable approach to monitor brain health across community sites.

Design/Methods:

T2-weighted pMRI scans were analyzed from 1,311 participants (mean age 50.8 ± 18.8 years, 70.6% female) across 14 community sites in Arizona and Southern California. Sixteen regional brain volumes were segmented with WMH-Synthseg, a machine-learning tool optimized for pMRI. These volumes were entered into a LASSO regression model (5-fold cross-validation) to predict chronological age. Performance was evaluated using mean absolute error. Multivariable associations between the corrected brain-age gap and vascular risk factors were evaluated. Additional analyses examined predictors of extreme deviation.

Results:

The model achieved a mean absolute error of 8.7 years (95% CI, 8.3-9.0) and R2=0.68 (95% CI, 0.65-0.70). In multivariable analyses, BMI, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol were associated with greater brain-age deviation, while sex, diabetes, and race were not. Participants with a brain-age gap ≥10 years older were more likely to have high cholesterol (OR=2.2[1.50-3.10], p<0.001), whereas those with a brain-age gap ≥10 years younger were more often female (OR=1.6[1.10-2.30], p=0.01) and did not have high blood pressure (OR=0.64[0.46-0.90], p<0.01). No single demographic strongly predicted deviation magnitude (R2=0.007).

Conclusions:

Portable MRI brain-age modeling offers accessible estimates of biological brain-age using low-field data acquired in community settings. The model identifies expected neuroanatomical aging patterns and vascular correlates of accelerated brain aging. These results support the feasibility of population-level brain-health screening with portable MRI and highlight the possibility to track modifiable risk factors in real-world environments.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000217082
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.