Smartphone Application-mediated, Supervised, At-home Telespirometry Identifies Statistically Significant Differences in Erect and Supine Slow Vital Capacity and ALSFRS-R Decline as a Function of Non-invasive Ventilation Treatment Status in Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal, Observational Clinical Study [NCT05106569]
Eufrosina Young1, Dongliang Wang1, George Slavinski1, Dragos Manta1, Birendra Sah1, Urvi Desai2, Lena Deb1, Marielle Posmik1, Jeffrey Collins1, Emma Blystone1, Jenny Meyer1, Grace Biso1, Darshana Vijaywargiya1, Sara Abdelhafiz1, Takuya Kudo3, Kinjal Patel4, Stephen Apple4, Benjamin Brooks5
1SUNY Upstate Medical University, 2Atrium Health Neuroscience Institute, 3Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, 4Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma America, 5Clinical Trials Planning LLC
Objective:

Measure eSVC/sSVC and ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) twice monthly up to 6 months via AHT in ALS subjects between quarterly in-clinic eSVC/sSVC assessments in a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal, observational clinical study [NCT05106569] using ZEPHYRx™ Breathe Easy software and Remote Respiratory Monitoring™/Provider Dashboard.

Background:
Smartphone application–mediated at-home telespirometry (AHT) assessed erect and supine slow vital capacity (eSVC/sSVC) longitudinally between clinic visits in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) subjects as a function of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) treatment status identified that eSVC/sSVC declined faster in ALS subjects with eSVC baseline 80% predicted vs >80% predicted. 
Design/Methods:

eSVC/sSVC were measured longitudinally via AHT as previously reported. In this analysis, ALSFRS-R changes were examined longitudinally alongside eSVC/sSVC in-clinic or via smartphone. Delta eSVC/sSVC and ALSFRS-R total trajectories were analyzed with a linear mixed methods model involving baseline covariates.

Results:

Ninety-eight subjects (NIV started at baseline=21, NIV started post-baseline=36, NIV non-users=41) consented to participate; 71 (72.5%) subjects completed a minimum of 6 AHT. Mean monthly decline rate for ALSFRS-R total score (−1.3 units/month [Q1, Q3=−1.8, −0.5]) of NIV non-users was statistically significantly different (p=0.001) from the monthly decline rate (−2.2 units/month [Q1, Q3=−2.8, −1.2]) for subjects who were not on NIV at baseline but started later.

 

Conclusions:

This first prospective, longitudinal, observational study of smartphone–mediated AHT eSVC/sSVC measurement identified statistically significant differences in monthly decline of eSVC/sSVC and ALSFRS-R total score between subjects not requiring NIV and those on NIV vs subjects not on NIV at baseline who started NIV during the study. NIV use, due to its potential to alter both respiratory and motor function, needs to be more carefully captured in clinical trials and clinical studies to permit correct conclusions regarding pharmacological and device interventions.

 

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216890
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.