Leveraging MHConstructor to Uncover Structural Variation in the MHC in Alzheimer’s Disease
Ilaria Stewart1, Kristen Wade1, Alexis Oddi1, Stefanie Piña-Escudero1, Jill Hollenbach1, José Alberto Ávila Funes2, María Isabel Behrens3, Martin Alejandro Bruno4, Luis Ignacio Brusco5, Nilton Custodio Capunay6, David Aguillón7, Diana Matallana8, Andrea Slachevsky Chonchol3, Leonel Tadao Takada9, Lina Maria Zapata-Restrepo10, Bruce Miller1, Mike Nalls11, Andrew Singleton12, Caroline Pantazis13, J. Nicholas Cochran14, Jared Taylor14, Victor Valcour1, Agustin Ibañez15, Jennifer Yokoyama1
1University of California, San Francisco, 2Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, 3, Clínica Alemana–Universidad del Desarrollo, 4Universidad Católica de Cuyo, 5Argentine Alzheimer’s Association, 6Instituto Peruano De Neurociencias, 7Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, 8Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 9Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias, 10Hospital Universitario Fundación Santa Fe, 11Data Tecnica International, 12National Institutes of Health, 13National Institute on Aging and National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, 14HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, 15Universidad Adolfo Ibañez
Objective:

To use, high-coverage whole genome sequencing in large cohorts to characterize C4/HLA allelic and structural variation within the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) to identify variants contributing to early-onset and late-onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD/LOAD).

Background:

The MHC houses many immune genes and is the most gene-dense polymorphic region of the genome. While it has been strongly linked to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) risk, its sequence complexity has limited investigations into how MHC variation influences AD.

Design/Methods:
We applied MHConstructor, alongside T1K and C4Investigator, to assemble the MHC and analyze C4/HLA loci in the Multi-Partner Consortium to Expand Dementia Research in Latin America (ReDLat) cohort.
Results:

In a ReDLat pilot cohort (13 samples: 4 EOAD, 4 LOAD, 5 controls), we did not replicate prior findings that C4A/B copy number is elevated in AD, finding no significant difference between EOAD, LOAD, and controls. Though there were no differences in C4A/B copy number between EOAD and LOAD in this cohort, we expect differences may emerge as we scale the pipeline. No novel structural variants (SVs) were found surrounding C4, but putative structural variants were identified near HLA genes, including three overlapping HLA-A and one upstream of HLA-DQB1. These preliminary findings underscore the locus’s complex contribution to AD.

Conclusions:

We demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing MHConstructor to interrogate MHC variation in AD, identifying candidate SVs in individuals with EOAD/LOAD. Though we have yet proven their association with Alzheimer’s, this pilot cohort demonstrates our capacity to apply this approach to the full cohort, for robust association testing in larger cohorts (Memory and Aging Center cohort, ReDLat, and the Alzheimer’s Disease Sequencing Project). Beyond AD, this pipeline provides a framework for investigating MHC variation in other contexts, such as transplantation, immunotherapy, and adverse drug response.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216886
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.