Shunting, Optic Nerve Sheath Fenestration, Dural Venous Stenting and Bariatric Surgery for Medically Refractory Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Toka Elboraay1, khaled Abu Elkhair1, Mohamed Alaa hussein1, Ahmed khedr2, Amira Aboali3, Omar Rageh4, Mena Maged1, Yehia Nabil1, Mohamed Karam5, Mahmoud A. Taha1, Yasmin Negida1
1Faculty of medicine Zagazig university, 2-Faculty of Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria, 3Faculty of Medicine, 4Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt., 5Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
Objective:
To systematically compare the efficacy and safety of major surgical interventions for patients with medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Background:

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), or pseudotumor cerebri, is characterized by elevated intracranial pressure (>25 cm H₂O) without an identifiable cause, most common in obese women of reproductive age. Patients typically present with headaches, papilledema, tinnitus, and visual disturbances that may lead to vision loss. Treatment includes lifestyle modification, medical therapy, and surgical interventions such as CSF shunting, venous sinus stenting, optic nerve sheath fenestration, and bariatric surgery, each with varying efficacy and complication rates.

Design/Methods:

A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus up to March 5, 2024, to identify studies evaluating surgical interventions for IIH. Data on clinical outcomes and complications were extracted and pooled for analysis.

Results:

From 119 pooled studies, there were 2561 CSF-diversion cases, 888 dural venous stent placements,1189 ONSF procedures and 249 Bariatric surgery. Postoperative improvement rates were as follows: headaches (CSF vs.VSS vs. ONSF vs. Bariatric surgery: 38% vs. 47% vs. 36% vs. 14%), papilledema (39% vs. 25% vs.10% vs. 14%), tinnitus (27% vs. 27% vs. 14%), visual field defect (32% vs. 43% vs. 33% vs. 72%), whilst visual acuity changes favored Bariatric surgery (33% vs. 57% vs. 31% vs.71%). There was a significantly lower rate of subsequent procedures with Bariatric surgery (39% vs. 5% vs. 23% vs. 0%), minor complication rates were (13% vs. 1% vs. 15% vs. 1%) and major complication rates were (11% vs.1% vs. 1% vs. 1%).

Conclusions:

Dural venous sinus stenting and bariatric surgery showed superior outcomes and lower complication rates compared to traditional surgical options, suggesting they may represent the most effective interventions for patients with medically refractory IIH.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216771
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.