Detection of Consciousness in Unresponsive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Alon Gorenshtein1, Liron Leibovitch2, Michael Young3
1AI in Neurology Laboratory, Rambam Medical Center, 2Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, 3Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Brigham, Harvard
Objective:

Quantify the detection rate of covert consciousness in behaviorally unresponsive patients, compare yields across paradigms and settings, and evaluate prognostic associations.

 

Background:

Covert consciousness is a condition of preserved awareness after critical injury or illness that evades routine bedside detection. Reported rates of covert consciousness vary widely across studies, modalities, and settings.

Design/Methods:

Systematic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (January 2006–September 31, 2025). Inclusion: Studies of disorders of consciousness using pre-specified positivity rules for active or passive paradigms. Primary meta-analysis used each study’s main paradigm; additional paradigms were reserved for sensitivity analyses. Random-effects GLMMs estimated pooled detection overall and by paradigm/modality; pre-specified meta-regression tested moderators (analytic stringency, sessions per patient, task class, accuracy).

Results:

94 studies were identified (n=2,652). The pooled detection of covert consciousness was 32.8% (95% CI 28.7–37.3; I²=76.6%). Cognitive-motor dissociation (active task) was detected at 31.5% (95% CI 26.0–37.6; k=61). Covert cortical processing (passive paradigm) detected at 35.0% (95% CI 27.9–42.8; k=25). By modality, EEG (including brain-computer interfaces) exceeded fMRI (active task: 36.1%, 95% CI 28.1-45, k=37 vs 22.1%, 15.6–30.4, k=16). Detection rate was lower in acute settings in comparison to chronic (23.4%, 95% CI 16.6–31.9; k=14 vs 28.7–39.5; k=65). In meta-regression, greater analytic stringency (i.e. more conservative positivity rules) was associated with lower detection (β=−0.514, p<0.001), while more EEG sessions per patient predicted higher detection (β=0.858, p<0.001). In BCI studies, higher accuracy thresholds were linked to lower pooled detection (β=−1.119, p=0.023). On follow-up, covertly conscious patients had larger CRS-R gains (Hedges g=1.40, 95% CI 0.44–2.37; k=8).

Conclusions:

Approximately one-third of behaviorally unresponsive patients demonstrate evidence of covert consciousness. Yield is higher with EEG, in mixed/chronic settings, and lower under stricter thresholds. Positivity is associated with improved functional gains. Results support standardized, multimodal, serial assessment with explicit thresholds for interpretation.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216760
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.