The Role of Neural Plasticity in Cancer Pain Management: A Comprehensive Review of Neuroimaging Studies and Cognitive Interventions
Gaurav Kansal1, Ashvath Pillai3, Sai K Reddy pasya4, Naveen Goyal2, Nimrah Fatima5, Lasyapriya Cherukupalli6, Vrinda R Prabhu7, Haindavi Bandari8
1Department of medicine and surgery, Government Medical College Patiala, Punjab,India, 2Government Medical College Patiala, Punjab,India, 3SSPM Medical College And Lifetime HospitalPadve,Sindhudurg,Maharashtra, 4University Of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City,KS, 5Ayaan Institute of Medical Sciences, Moinabad, Telangana, 6Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences,Narketpally, 7KIMS Medical college, Bengaluru,India, 8Osmania Medical College,Hyderabad,Telangana
Objective:
To comprehensively evaluate how neural plasticity contributes to cancer-related pain and to determine the effects of cognitive and neuromodulatory interventions such as MBCT, CBT, tDCS, and rTMS on pain modulation as evidenced by neuroimaging and validated clinical outcomes.
Background:
Pain related to cancer has a considerable impact on the quality of life due to maladaptive neural phenomena and neuroinflammation. Cognitive therapies such as MBCT and CBT might be the avenues through which pain perception can be altered via neuroplasticity, yet systematic studies are scarce.
Design/Methods:
Adult cancer patients with pain conditions were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. Included studies investigated cognitive interventions (MBCT, CBT) that were assessed via neuroimaging (fMRI, PET, EEG) or validated outcomes. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
Results:
18 studies of 9 RCTs, 3 longitudinal, 4 pilot, and 4 protocol papers revealed maladaptive plasticity, which includes prefrontal cortex atrophy and anterior cingulate hyperactivity associated with chronic pain. Cognitive training and MBCT reduced pain intensity with the enhanced dorsolateral prefrontal activation, while neuromodulation through tDCS and rTMS and melatonin down-regulated descending inhibition. Pain neuroscience education showed stiff UOR. Findings were limited due to small samples and sample heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
Interventions for the treatment of cancer pain may be cognitive and neuromodulatory therapies to target neural plasticity; however, their full potential can be realized only in biomarker-guided longitudinal trials. From these findings, one can make a strong case for multimodal, mechanism-based interventions that carry hope for increasing pain relief and, subsequently, quality of life in cancer patients.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000216689
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.