Demyelination Reported with Biologic Therapies for Rheumatologic and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Insights from FAERS
Asmaa Almadaoji1, Olaf Stuve2, Afsaneh Shirani3
1Saba University School of Medicine, 2UT Southwestern Medical Center, 3Saint Luke's Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute and the University of Missouri-Kansas City
Objective:

To evaluate the association between biologic therapies for rheumatologic disorders and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and the occurrence of demyelinating adverse events using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Background:

Comparative analyses of demyelination-related safety signals across different classes of biologic therapies used for rheumatologic disorders and IBD remain limited. Newer agents have less post-marketing data regarding demyelination risk. Pharmacovigilance-based detection of safety signals can help guide clinical decision-making and regulatory oversight.

Design/Methods:

We performed a disproportionality analysis of FAERS data from the fourth quarter of 2003 through the second quarter of 2025 to evaluate demyelinating events associated with anti-rheumatic and anti-IBD biologic therapies. Mechanistic classes included: anti–tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents, anti-integrin antibodies (excluding natalizumab), anti-interleukin agents (including IL-12/23, IL-23, IL-17, IL-6, and IL-1 inhibitors), B-cell targeted therapies (excluding rituximab), and T-cell co-stimulation modulators. The preferred term “demyelination” was used to identify relevant adverse events. A safety signal was defined according to Evans criteria as ≥3 reports, a proportional reporting ratio (PRR) ≥2, and a chi-squared value ≥4.

Results:

Safety signals for demyelination were identified with TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, and etanercept) with a PRR of 7.34 (95% CI: 6.75–7.98), and abatacept, a selective T-cell co-stimulation modulator (PRR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.41–3.20). No safety signals were observed for IL-12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab, bimekizumab), IL-23 inhibitors (mirikizumab, guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), and anti-α4β7 integrin (vedolizumab). Reporting counts were insufficient for IL-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab and sarilumab), IL-1 inhibitors (anakinra, canakinumab, and rilonacept), and B-lymphocyte stimulator (belimumab) to allow disproportionality analysis.

Conclusions:

Our findings confirm strong pharmacovigilance signals for demyelination with TNF-α inhibitors and suggest a possible signal with abatacept, whereas newer interleukin and integrin inhibitors did not demonstrate similar associations. These results support continued vigilance and post-marketing surveillance to better define demyelination risk across biologic classes.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216445
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.