Improved Low Contrast Visual Acuity, Reduction in Retinal Ganglion Cell Loss, and Neurofilaments-light with Privosegtor in Acute Optic Neuritis: Results from a Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked Trial
Pablo Villoslada1, Celine Louapre2, Sophie Bonnin3, Louise-Laure Mariani2, Mikael Cohen4, Caroline Froment5, Mark Kupersmith6, Leonard A Levin7, Sabri Markabi8, Caroline Papeix2, Valérie Touitou2, Rossella Medori9, Marion R. Munk10, Martin S. Zinkernagel10, Sebastian Wolf10
1Neurology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, 2Neurology, 3Ophthalmology, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, APHP, 4Neurology, Hopital Pasteur, 5Neuro-Opthalmology, Hopital Neurologique Et Neurochirurgical P Wertheimer, 6Neuro-Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, 7Ophthalmology, McGill University, 8Health R&D LLC, 9Prexton Therapeutics SA, 10Ophthalmology, University Hospital Bern
Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of privosegtor in acute optic neuritis (AON).

Background:

Privosegtor (OCS-05), a peptoid small molecule with neuroprotective activity, is being studied as a treatment for AON.

Design/Methods:

The ACUITY phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study evaluated privosegtor (2 or 3 mg/kg IV daily for 5 days) as an addition to methylprednisolone IV in patients with AON of less than 12 days duration, excluding AQP4+ patients. The primary endpoint was safety. Key secondary endpoints included changes in 2.5% low contrast visual acuity (LCVA), ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. The exploratory endpoint measured changes in plasma neurofilament-light (NfL) levels. Efficacy analyses used a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures to estimate least-squares mean change from baseline, with 90% confidence intervals and nominal two-sided p-values.

Results:

Thirty-three randomized participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis, with balanced baseline characteristics. Improvement in LCVA compared to placebo with privosegtor 3 mg/kg/day was 18.2 (5.7) letters at Month 3 (90% CI: 8.4, 27.9, P=0.004), and 14.8 (5.5) letters at Month 6 (90% CI: 5.4, 24.1, P=0.012). There was a 43% reduction in GCIPL thinning compared with placebo at Months 3 and 6. RNFL thinning showed reductions of 28% at Month 3 and 30% at Month 6. Mean plasma NfL concentrations remained stable from baseline (6.6 µg/ml) to Month 1 (7.6 µg/ml) and Month 6 (5.8 µg/ml) with privosegtor. The placebo group showed a significant increase from baseline (8.6 µg/ml) at Month 1 (14.6 µg/ml), followed by a steady decline to Month 6 (9.3 µg/ml). Adverse events showed no differences in incidence between groups, with no drug-related serious adverse events.

Conclusions:

Privosegtor demonstrated significant improvement in visual function, reduced retinal ganglion cell damage, and lowered NfL changes, suggesting neuroaxonal preservation. The drug was well-tolerated by participants.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216304
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.