Genetic Testing in Idiopathic Optic Neuropathy: Diagnostic Yield and Differences in Clinical Presentation
Nagashreyaa Nagajothi1, Samuel Lee1, Caroline Mura1, Connolly Steigerwald1, Rachel Kenney1, Steven Galetta1, Laura Balcer1, Nicolas Abreu1, Scott Grossman1
1NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Objective:

To determine the diagnostic yield of genetic testing in idiopathic optic neuropathy and to compare clinical characteristics of patients with a confirmed genetic etiology of their optic neuropathy to those with negative testing.

Background:

Chronic optic neuropathy classically presents with visual acuity loss, dyschromatopsia, and optic atrophy. Identifying an underlying cause is essential for management; yet many cases remain idiopathic even after comprehensive neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation. Advances in genetic testing now allow for detection of hereditary etiologies that may mimic acquired optic neuropathies.

Design/Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted for a convenience sample of patients with chronic optic neuropathies who underwent genetic testing following nondiagnostic neuro-ophthalmologic evaluation. Clinical characteristics, including color vision (Ishihara plates), high-contrast visual acuity, low-contrast letter acuity, visual field mean deviation (VFMD), and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness by optical coherence tomography (OCT), were compared between eyes of patients with vs. without a confirmed genetic diagnosis.  Generalized estimating equation models (GEE) were used to examine whether having a confirmed genetic diagnosis was associated with worse scores/measurements.  Only clinically affected eyes were included, with most patients contributing data for both eyes.  
Results:

There were 26 patients; all had received genetic testing.  The proportion who had a genetic diagnosis was 11/26 (42% [95% CI, 23%, 61%]). The most frequent pathogenic variants involved WFS1 and MT-ND4. At initial evaluation, eyes in the genetic group demonstrated less visual field loss (average VFMD −2.2 vs. −11.8 dB; difference +9.3 dB (95% CI 2.8, 15.9; p=0.005).  No significant differences were observed for other tests.

Conclusions:

Our results demonstrate that hereditary optic neuropathies can present with subtle or variable phenotypes, supporting the inclusion of genetic testing even in mildly affected idiopathic cases.  The visual field was a key test that separated our two groups. Genetic testing may have high yield in patients with chronic idiopathic optic neuropathy. 

10.1212/WNL.0000000000216199
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.