An Open-label Study Evaluating the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety of Tanruprubart Single Dose in Participants From North America and Europe With Guillain-Barré Syndrome
Shafeeq Ladha1, Rafid Mustafa2, Kavita Grover3, Glenn Morrison4, Ping Lin4, Henk-André Kroon4, Jeffrey Allen5
1Barrow Neurological Institute, 2Mayo Clinic College of Medicine & Science, 3Henry Ford Hospital and Wayne State University, 4Annexon Biosciences, 5University of Minnesota
Objective:
Characterize the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and safety of tanruprubart 30 mg/kg in participants with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) from North America and Europe.
Background:
GBS is a neuromuscular emergency driven by classical complement activation that, despite current treatments, leads to significant morbidity and mortality in previously healthy individuals. Tanruprubart, a monoclonal antibody targeting C1q, the initiating molecule of classical complement, has been studied in a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with GBS in southeast Asia. Tanruprubart 30 mg/kg was well tolerated and participants were 2.4 times more likely to be in a better state of health (GBS-DS; p=0.0058) versus placebo at Week 8 with rapid improvement in muscle strength (MRCss) from Week 1.
Design/Methods:
GBS-FORWARD is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of single intravenous administration tanruprubart 30 mg/kg in US and European participants recently diagnosed with GBS. Participants must be 12–85 years old, have a GBS diagnosis per NINDS criteria, with onset of GBS-related weakness ≤10 days before infusion on Day 1. Participants will remain hospitalized from screening until assessment completion on Day 8 or until medically cleared for release, whichever occurs later. Participants will have follow-up visits through Week 26 and receive best supportive care, omitting intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange unless as a rescue treatment.
Results:
Approximately 30 participants are planned for enrollment. The primary objective is to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a single tanruprubart dose, which will enable comparison with pharmacokinetic data obtained from previous studies in participants from Southeast Asia. The study is powered to compare MRC sumscore at Week 1 with an IVIg-treated, external control group from the International GBS Outcome Study database.
Conclusions:
This study will add to the extensive body of evidence showing the benefit of tanruprubart in patients with GBS and confirm previous study findings in a population from North America and Europe.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.