Phase 1b Study of the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of ARGX-119 in Participants with DOK7 Congenital Myasthenic Syndromes
Hanns Lochmuller1, Lorenzo Maggi2, Nancy Kuntz3, Steven Burden4, Tonke van Bragt5, Stéphanie Dincq6, Willem Talloen6, Jamie Lim6, Hege Michiels6, Sonya Patel6, Syed Raza6, Kate Lyden7, Ieuan Clay7, Yaya Zhai7, Robert Marcotte7, Roeland Vanhauwaert6, Rebecca Shilling6, Jacqueline Palace8
1Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute; The Ottawa Hospital; Brain and Mind Research Institute, University of Ottawa, 2Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 3Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, 4Harvard University; Massachusetts General Hospital, 5Curare Consulting BV, 6argenx, 7VivoSense, Inc., 8John Radcliffe Hospital; University of Oxford
Objective:

This phase 1b, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study (NCT06436742) evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and efficacy of ARGX-119 in adults with DOK7 congenital myasthenic syndromes (DOK7-CMS).

Background:

CMS are a rare, heterogeneous group of inherited disorders caused by mutations impairing neuromuscular transmission, with no approved treatments. Mutations in the DOK7 gene represent one of the common causes of CMS. ARGX‑119, a humanized, agonistic, monoclonal antibody, specifically targets and activates muscle-specific kinase, which may stabilize and improve neuromuscular junction function in DOK7-CMS, to potentially reduce muscle weakness/fatigability and improve quality of life (QoL).

Design/Methods:

Participants underwent intrapatient dose escalation and were randomized 4:1 to intravenous ARGX-119 or placebo for 6 doses over the 12-week treatment period followed by a ~7-month follow-up period. Primary endpoint was safety assessment. Efficacy endpoints included key components of the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score, Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, and PROMIS Global Health score, measures of physical function and mobility (eg, Six-Minute Walk Test [6MWT] total distance walked and cadence assessed using digital sensors), and QoL.

Results:

Sixteen participants were randomized to ARGX-119 (n=13) or placebo (n=3). ARGX-119 was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events (AEs), grade ≥3 AEs, or discontinuations due to AEs. Clinically meaningful increase (≥50 m) in median 6MWT distance was reported in participants receiving ARGX-119, with consistent improvements in median cadence measured using digital sensors. Improvements occurred in QMG key components (“both legs outstretched,” “both arms outstretched,” and “head lifted”) in the ARGX-119 arm. Consistent improvements also occurred in MG-ADL over time compared with study baseline in the ARGX-119 arm. Ambulatory (no wheelchair use at baseline) participants receiving ARGX-119 demonstrated coherence in response across most endpoints measuring leg function; this coherence in response did not occur in participants in the placebo arm.

Conclusions:

Results demonstrate proof-of-biology for ARGX-119 in participants with DOK7-CMS.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000215922
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.