Prediction of Unfavorable Disability Outcome in NeuroCOVID Patients with Stroke: A Penalized Model based on the NeuroCOVID Databank
Sarah Youssef1, Liza de Groot2, Ahmed Shaheen3, Adenike Adeagbo4, Cecile Norris4, Mohamed Salama1, Martijn Heymans2
1Institute of Global Health & Human Ecology, The American University in Cairo, 2Department of Epidemiology and Data Science; Amsterdam Public Health, Methodology program, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 3Department of Neurology, Alexandria Faculty of Medicine, 4Department of Population Health, NYU Langone Health
Objective:

We aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model for unfavorable disability outcome in patients with COVID-19-associated stroke based on multicenter data from the NIH-funded NEUROCOVID Databank. 

 

 

Background:
COVID-19-associated stroke is associated with higher mortality and poorer functional outcomes compared to non-COVID stroke. None of the existing prognostic scales for predicting acute stroke functional outcome was derived from cohorts with COVID-19.
Design/Methods:

We obtained patient data from the NeuroCOVID Databank after receiving data access/IRB approvals. The derivation cohort consisted of stroke cases from 13 USA centers (n=205), and the validation cohorts of cases from Asia (n=68) and Egypt (n=123). We included adult cases with ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke and a hospital admission associated with COVID-19. We assessed 15 candidate predictors, including patient-, COVID-19-, and stroke-related factors. Unfavorable disability outcome was defined as modified Rankin Score (mRS) >3 at hospital discharge. We applied Median Aggregation of penalized Coefficients after Multiple Imputation (MALCoM) for variable selection and model development in multiply imputed datasets. Model Performance was evaluated using ROC curves (AUC), and accuracy was estimated in the derivation and test datasets. Subgroup analysis by stroke type was conducted.

Results:

396 patients were included: 205 in the USA development cohort, 123, and 68 in Egypt and Asia validation cohorts. Predictors’ distribution significantly varied between cohorts; however, the outcome distribution didn’t. In the development cohort, the model showed an AUC of 0.84 (0.78-0.9). Model accuracy was higher in ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke subgroups (0.86 vs. 0.65). In the validation cohorts, receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded AUCs of 0.61 (Egypt ) and 0.51(Asia).

 

Conclusions:

The model shows good performance in the development cohort and decreased performance in the validation cohorts, likely due to striking differences in patient characteristics between the large development and small validation cohorts. Extra validation in larger cohorts is needed before using the model in clinical practice.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000215748
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.