High Seizure Burden and Limited Treatment Persistence in Epilepsy: Findings from the EMPOWER Observational Study and a US Real-world Claims Analysis
Brittany Gazdag1, Karl Hansen1, Alex La Croix1, Megan Sniecinski1, Steven Petrou1, Marcio Souza1
1Praxis Precision Medicines
Objective:

To characterize epilepsy burden and unmet needs associated with ASM use through patient-reported data from the EMPOWER study and real-world claims data from adults with focal onset seizures (FOS). 

Background:

Epilepsy affects ~50 million people worldwide, many of whom live with uncontrolled seizures. Treatment side effects and frequent medication changes further compound patient burden. EMPOWER, a longitudinal observational study, describes the epilepsy journey and seizure burden across epilepsy types. A complementary US claims analysis of adults with FOS examines population-level treatment use, persistence and seizure control. 

Design/Methods:

EMPOWER participants (≥18 years, n~600) were followed up to 24 months, capturing demographics, disease course, seizure-tracking and ASM use via electronic diary and surveys. A retrospective claims analysis evaluated prescribing patterns and seizure control among ~440,000 adults with FOS who had >1 ICD-10 diagnosis code for FOS, identified through billing and pharmacy claims between 2016 and 2023. 

Results:

Across both datasets, inadequate seizure control and treatment burden were evident. Two-thirds of EMPOWER respondents reported ≥1 seizure in the prior month, 40% required ≥2 ASMs, and nearly half rated their epilepsy as uncontrolled. Seizures and ASM side effects disrupted daily life, with 90% reporting fear of another seizure and many limiting social or occupational activities.  

FOS claims revealed rapid treatment cycling and limited persistence: 63% of patients advanced beyond first-line therapy, and three-quarters progressed to further lines. Median time on therapy declined from 295 to 114 days between first- and fifth-line treatments, with persistence leveling out ~6 months after first prescription, varying widely by drug class. 
Conclusions:

EMPOWER and FOS claims analyses provide complementary perspectives on epilepsy burden. Patient-reported data reveal the lived impact of uncontrolled seizures and reduced quality-of-life, while real-world evidence highlights limited treatment persistence in FOS. Together, they reinforce the need for novel therapies to achieve sustained seizure control and improve long-term outcomes. 

10.1212/WNL.0000000000215738
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.