High-throughput Proteomics in CSF and Plasma from ALS Patients Identifies Novel Biomarkers Related to Muscle Structure and Function
Aparna Vasanthakumar1, Jennifer Mollon1, Romica Kerketta1, Anahita Bhathena1, William Cho2, Amos Baruch2, Nicholas Seneca1
1AbbVie, 2Calico
Objective:
Identification of novel disease-associated proteins across cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma from ALS patients.
Background:
In ALS there have been limited biomarkers identified which can be used to diagnose, predict the course of, or assess treatment response for the disease.
Design/Methods:
We performed proteomic analysis using the Olink® Explore 3072 platform. Procured CSF and plasma samples from ALS patients (CSF: n = 44; plasma: n = 34) and age-matched healthy controls (CSF: n = 55; plasma: n = 30) were used for proteomic analyses. A sub-set of subjects had both CSF and plasma samples (ALS: n = 17 and controls: n = 21) allowing us to compare protein expression levels for the same donors across matrices.
Results:
In CSF, we identified previously reported proteins that are differentially expressed in ALS, including Neurofilament light (NfL) and Chitinase 1 (CHIT1). Importantly, in both matrices, we have identified several novel biomarkers associated with immune and muscle-related pathways. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of differentially expressed proteins in both CSF and plasma showed enrichment of muscle-related proteins including MYBPC1 (r=0.72), MYL3 (r=0.82) and MYOM3 (r=0.81). Furthermore, in a cross-sectional analysis, ADAMTS8 was found to be significantly associated with ALSFRS-R scores (r=0.78, FDR q < 0.5).
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that there is an overlap of the proteome across plasma and CSF associated with ALS. This may facilitate the use of plasma as a surrogate for disease processes in the CSF, a more difficult-to-obtain matrix. We also found novel muscle related proteins as potential biomarkers, which may allow further understanding of ALS pathophysiology and inform research on disease progression and treatment response.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.