Efficacy of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering on Outcomes in Spontaneous Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage: A Meta-analysis
Kenneth Jordan1, Mohammad Azeem2, Jonna Peterson3, Michael Wesolowski4, Michael Schneck5
1Loyola University Medical Center, 2Neurology, Aurora Sinai Medical Center, 3Health Science Library, Loyola University, 4Loyola Medical School, 5Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine
Objective:
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to determine the efficacy of intensive blood pressure (iBP) control following spontaneous intraparenchymal hemorrhage (sIPH).  
Background:
To date, there has been no definitive data published regarding optimal blood pressure control following sIPH. This paper seeks to use available RCT data to determine the optimal blood pressure range.   
Design/Methods:
Databases for RCTs (up to 2023) involving management of blood pressure following sIPH were reviewed. Seven studies meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria and published data sufficient to calculate the effect of iBP lowering on post-stroke functional outcomes as measured by modified Rankin score (mRs), with scores being dichotomized as either poor (3-6) or good (0-2). Methods and definitions of intensive blood pressure treatments varied between studies; therefore, a random-effects meta-analysis model was used to evaluate the studies. 
Results:
Relative risk (RR) estimates ranged from a value of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.65-1.17) to a value of 1.27 (95% CI, 0.70-2.29). Five studies showed that iBP lowering was protective against poor functional outcome (RR < 1.00), one study found iBP lowering to be a risk factor for poor functional outcome (RR > 1.00), and one study estimated a RR of exactly 1.00. All but one study included the null value of 1.00 in the 95% confidence interval for their RR estimate. The summary RR effect for iBP lowering on post-stroke mRs functional outcome was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), which was statistically significant having a p < 0.01. Across all studies, the risk of poor mRs (3-6) post-stroke functional outcome was reduced by 5% for patients who received an intensive blood pressure lowering therapy.  
Conclusions:
A RR of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98, p < 0.01) supports iBP lowering after sIPH and reduces the risk of poor functional outcome (mRs 3-6) when compared to standard blood pressure lowering. 
10.1212/WNL.0000000000215497
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.