Epilepsy-related and All-cause Healthcare Resource Utilization After Initiation of Adjunctive Cenobamate
Emily Klatte1, Sean Stern2, Marc Kamin2, Clarence Wade2, Wesley Kerr3
1Ohio Health Neurological Physicians, 2SK Life Science, Inc., 3University of Pittsburgh
Objective:
To evaluate the comparative effect of initiating cenobamate vs selected antiseizure medications (ASMs, brivaracetam, clobazam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, or perampanel) on epilepsy-related and all-cause inpatient (IP) and emergency room (ER) utilization rates.
Background:
Cenobamate is an ASM approved for adults in the US that has demonstrated efficacy across focal seizure subtypes.
Design/Methods:
A retrospective observational study using de-identified electronic health records from the Truveta database identified adults (≥18 years) with an epilepsy diagnosis who initiated cenobamate or another selected ASM between 1/1/202012/52024. The other selected ASMs were chosen based on similar patterns of use primarily in medication-resistant epilepsy. Patients were included if they reached a minimum effective dose (100 mg for cenobamate, per US label for selected ASMs) and remained on treatment for ≥90 days after initiation. Patients with an epilepsy-related ER visit or IP admission in the previous 180 days were excluded. The endpoints were the annual rate of epilepsy-related and all-cause ER visits and IP admissions evaluated during the 90-day period after initiation and subsequent 360-day period.
Results:
The study sample contained 1805 patients (mean age 41.4 years, 51.2% female), including 361 patients who initiated cenobamate and 1444 propensity-matched patients who initiated other selected ASMs. In the epilepsy-related analysis, treatment with cenobamate was associated with a 48% reduction (95% CI: 29%-61%) vs the selected ASM group in annual IP admissions, and a 35% reduction (95% CI: 8%-54%) in annual ER visits. In the all-cause analysis, treatment with cenobamate was associated with a 37% reduction (95% CI: 25%-48%) vs the select ASM group in annual IP admissions, and a 34% reduction (95% CI: 23%-43%) in annual ER visits.
Conclusions:
Initiating cenobamate was associated with a significant reduction in both epilepsy-related and all-cause IP admissions and ER visits compared to propensity-matched patients who similarly could have initiated cenobamate but instead initiated other ASMs.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000215312
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.