Deep Brain Stimulation for Refractory Myoclonus-dystonia: A Case-by-case Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ajaz Sheikh1, Mehmood Rashid1, Fahima Akter Shammi1, Naeem Mahfooz1, Imran Ali2, Judy Zheng1, Jennifer Amsdell3, Syed Muhammad Owais1, Hira Burhan4
1University of Toledo, 2University of Toledo COM, 3Promedica Neuroscience Center, 4The University of Toledo
Objective:
To perform a case-by-case analysis of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for refractory myoclonus–dystonia (M-D), and identify EEG/EMG phenotypes, DBS targets, programming, and outcomes, including post-hypoxic epileptic myoclonus as seen in Lance–Adams syndrome (LAS).
Background:
The evidence for DBS as a treatment for myoclonus dystonia is scattered across small reports with variable targets and parameters. To better understand its utility in management, a concise, practice-oriented summary is needed.
Design/Methods:
We performed a PRISMA-guided search including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and other sources for screening. Our inclusion criteria was based on studies with patients diagnosed with M-D (± LAS) treated with DBS and reporting pre/post outcomes. For analysis, we extracted the electrophysiology, DBS target/laterality; initial/chronic settings (frequency, pulse width, amplitude, configuration); outcomes (UMRS, dystonia/functional), follow-up, adverse events. This was a descriptive case-by-case analysis
Results:

In our analysis, we found that most M-D cases used bilateral GPi with ~130 Hz, 60–90 µs, ~2–4 V/mA, showing clinically meaningful, durable improvement. In one detailed case, the patient's UMRS improved from 93→39 with parallel BFMDRS gains at ~3 years. Another 2-patient series reported resolution of myoclonus within 6–12 months on high-frequency GPi. A focal myoclonic-seizure phenotype improved long-term with unilateral STN.

In LAS, bilateral GPi showed frequency dependence: 130–160 Hz could worsen symptoms, whereas low frequency ~35–40 Hz (≈2.5 V, ~130 µs) improved UMRS subscales with sustained benefit. An adult progressive myoclonic epilepsy series favored SNr/STN at ~100–110 Hz with ~30–100% myoclonus reduction; VIM was generally ineffective or limited by side effects.

Adverse events were infrequent and typically parameter-responsive.

Conclusions:
Bilateral GPi DBS at conventional high frequency—yields meaningful, durable benefit in refractory M-D; STN may help select focal myoclonus. In LAS, low-frequency GPi can outperform high frequency, underscoring target- and frequency-specific programming. Adverse events appear uncommon and manageable. Standardized case reporting and prospective studies are needed to refine selection and programming.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000215190
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.