Since the first human use of VNS in 1997, efforts have focused on optimizing stimulation parameters, particularly duty cycles. A 2015 meta-analysis showed a correlation between higher stimulation levels and greater seizure reduction. Over time, shorter “off times” led to the classification of RDC as ≤ 1.8 minutes and NDC as ≥ 3 minutes.
A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane reviews for studies from 2000-2024 involving human subjects treated with VNS. Included studies compared RDC and NDC with above definition and reported ≥ 50% seizure responder rates. Both parallel cohort studies and randomized controlled trials were considered. Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data from eligible articles. A random-effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis.
This meta-analysis found no statistically significant advantage of RDC over NDC in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency among patients with refractory epilepsy. However, the trend toward improved outcomes with RDC, combined with low heterogeneity, highlights the need for further research. Larger, high-quality randomized controlled trials and crossover studies are recommended to better elucidate the potential benefits of RDC in VNS therapy.