Larotrectinib for NTRK Amplification in Glioblastoma: Case Report
Miloni Shah1, Michelle sue2, Jigisha Thakkar3
1Neurology, Loyola University Chicago, 2Loyola University Chicago, 3Loyola University Medical Center
Objective:
To report the treatment response of a patient with glioblastoma harboring NTRK2 amplification who received larotrectinib, a selective TRK inhibitor.
Background:

Larotrectinib is an FDA-approved TRK inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in TRK fusion–positive malignancies, including primary brain tumors. NTRK fusions have been associated with favorable intracranial responses in pediatric and adult gliomas. However, data on the use of larotrectinib in gliomas with NTRK amplification, as opposed to fusions, remains lacking

 

Design/Methods:

A single-patient case report. The following where chart reviewed and analyzed: Clinical history, imaging, pathology, and treatment course to assess response to larotrectinib.

 

Results:

A 51-year-old man with multifocal, MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma underwent resection followed by chemoradiation with temozolomide, six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide, and tumor treating fields. Four months after completing therapy, he developed progressive disease with a new left temporal lesion. He received radiation and bevacizumab, then was initiated on larotrectinib. Despite five months of therapy, disease progression continued, leading to discontinuation. Third-line lomustine and bevacizumab were subsequently initiated. Unlike reports of larotrectinib activity in NTRK fusion–positive gliomas, no clinical or radiographic response was observed in this patient with NTRK2 amplification.

 

Conclusions:

In patients with glioblastoma with NTRK amplification, this case suggests limited benefit with treatment with Larotrectinib as compared to previously demonstrated significant efficacy in NTRK fusion–positive gliomas. These findings highlight the necessary requirements to distinguish between NTRK fusions and amplifications when clinically considering targeted TRK inhibition. This case reports bridges the importance of molecular profiling to guide therapy selection.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000213268
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.