A Novel Prospective Study Design Evaluating Impact of Plasma P-tau217 Testing on Early Evaluation and Management of Patients in Primary and Secondary/Tertiary Care Private Practices
Cynthia Priscilla Sandoval1, Drew Spargo1, Ming Lu1, Anthony Sireci1, Amanda Morris1, Ann Hartry1, Samantha C. Burnham1, James Hendrix1, Rose C. Beck1
1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Objective:

We present a novel study design for J4Y-MC-S003, TEACH-AD (NCT07140744), which will evaluate impact of plasma P-tau217 testing on early management of patients presenting with subjective cognitive impairment complaints (SCIC). TEACH-AD will use a unique clinical practice database for participant identification and data collection.

Background:

Blood-based biomarker tests including P-tau217 support timely and practical evaluation for amyloid pathology in patients with cognitive decline; however evidence for test integration into clinical care for SCIC is limited. Evaluating primary care pathways is especially challenging. TEACH-AD will utilize an innovative, real-world healthcare provider (HCP) practice database to identify HCPs/patients and compare pre-defined management actions between patients receiving study-sponsored commercial plasma P-tau217 testing versus standard of care.

Design/Methods:

TEACH-AD is a prospective, diagnostic, interventional clinical utility study assessing the impact of P-tau217 testing on evaluation of patients ≥50 years with ≥1 SCIC, presenting to primary or secondary/tertiary care providers (PCPs, S/TCPs, respectively). HCPs/patients will be identified and endpoints assessed using a unique electronic health record (EHR) database, enabling agile, real-world practice participation not typical in clinical trials. Approximately 585 HCPs will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio at practice level to interventional or control arms. Interventional HCPs will incorporate study-sponsored P-tau217 testing into clinical workup. Control HCPs will remain uncontacted, without mandatory P-tau217 testing, and followed through EHR interrogation. The primary outcome is the difference between groups in proportion of patients receiving ≥1 pre-specified management action in primary care, at 6-months. Secondary outcomes include the same analysis with S/TCPs, differences in time to management action, and differences in International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) coding.

Results:

This abstract will present design/rationale of TEACH-AD.

Conclusions:

The TEACH-AD clinical utility study design will demonstrate the feasibility of measuring impact of plasma P-tau217 testing implementation within PCP and S/TCP practices, using a unique EHR database to identify/collect data from enrolled HCPs/patients.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000213121
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.