Responsive Neurostimulation Targeting Thalamic Nuclei in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes and Programming Parameters
Ana Leticia Fornari Caprara1, Jamir Pitton Rissardo1, Salman Assad1, Evren Burakgazi-Dalkilic1, Eric P. Nagele1
1Cooper University Hospital
Objective:

To summarize clinical outcomes, stimulation parameters, and safety of thalamic responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).

Background:

LGS is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy often refractory to medications and vagus nerve stimulation. Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian (CM) nucleus has shown promise, but data on closed-loop RNS targeting thalamic nuclei remain limited. Understanding programming strategies and outcomes is critical for optimizing therapy.

Design/Methods:

We performed a structured review of PubMed and clinical trial registries through September 2025 for studies reporting RNS in LGS or LGS phenotype. Extracted variables included demographics, seizure outcomes (≥50% responder rate), stimulation parameters, lead configuration, follow-up duration, and adverse events.

Results:

Nine studies (n=30 LGS patients) were identified: 2 case reports, 4 case series, 1 multicenter cohort, and 2 feasibility trials. Mean age at implant ranged from 12–17 years; follow-up ranged 5–24 months. Targets included CM (most common), anterior nucleus, and pulvinar. Reported programming typically used high-frequency stimulation (100–200 Hz), pulse width 160 μs, and current 1–3 mA, with individualized titration. ≥50% responder rates varied widely across studies (0%–100%), with a pooled weighted estimate of 56.7% (95% CI: 38.9%–74.4%). Adverse events were rare; one case of myasthenia gravis and two infections requiring intervention were reported. Concurrent neuromodulation (e.g., active VNS) was feasible without device interference. Ongoing IDE trials (NCT05339126) aim to clarify long-term efficacy and biomarker-driven programming.

Conclusions:
Thalamic RNS is a promising adjunctive therapy for LGS, offering individualized, closed-loop modulation with favorable safety. Early evidence suggests clinically meaningful seizure reduction in most patients, though heterogeneity in targets and programming underscores the need for prospective trials and standardized protocols.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000213061
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.