Robot-assisted Gait Training in Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Alzahra'a Al matairi1, Omar Abuhashem2, Bara Hammadeh3, Bana Al Najjar1, Mohamad Ezzeldin4
1University of Jordan, 2Jordan University of Science and Technology, 3albalqa' Applied University, 4University of Houston
Objective:
To assess the efficacy of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) versus conventional physiotherapy in cerebral palsy.
Background:
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the leading cause of chronic childhood disability, often marked by gait impairments that limit mobility and independence. RAGT offers intensive, repetitive practice with less therapist burden, but its effectiveness on gait, balance, and function in CP remains uncertain due to conflicting evidence.
Design/Methods:
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing RAGT with conventional therapy in patients with CP. Primary outcomes included gait, balance, and gross motor function. Study quality was assessed using the ROB 2 and GRADE frameworks. Meta-analysis was conducted using R, applying fixed- or random-effects models based on heterogeneity, with sensitivity, publication bias, and Trial Sequential Analysis to evaluate the robustness of findings.
Results:
A total of 15 studies involving 537 participants (239 girls and 298 boys; mean age 9.8 years) were included. Overall, robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) did not demonstrate superiority over conventional therapy. Meta-analyses showed significantly smaller improvements with RAGT in GMFM-88 Dimension D (MD –2.91, 95% CI –5.43 to –0.39) and Dimension E (MD –4.73, 95% CI –7.67 to –1.79), both favoring conventional physiotherapy. Similarly, 6MWT distance improvements were significantly greater in controls compared with RAGT (MD –17.52 m, 95% CI –27.34 to –7.70). Other gait parameters, including hip range of motion, stride length, walking speed, and balance scales, showed no significant between-group differences. Trial sequential analysis confirmed robust evidence in favor of conventional physiotherapy for GMFM-88 Dimension E and 6MWT, while evidence for other outcomes remained inconclusive.
Conclusions:
RAGT provides comparable improvements to conventional therapy in most motor, gait, and balance outcomes for children with CP, with physiotherapy showing modest advantages in walking distance and GMFM-88 Dimension E. Further trials are needed to confirm benefits for other outcomes.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.