Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Edaravone-Dexborneol in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients
Noor Naeem1, Syeda Verisha Batool2, Hafiz Shibli3, Aqsa Fareed4, Irfan Ullah5, Musfirah imtiaz6, Amber Naeem7, Haider Imran8, Hira Khan2, Muhammad Saeed Qazi9, Ayesha Ashar10, Anoosh Farooqui11
1Department of Medicine, Rashid Latif Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan, 2Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan, 3Department of Medicine, Lahore General Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, 4Department of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, 5Department of Medicine, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan, 6Department of Medicine, Hamdard College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan, 7Department of Medicine, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan, 8Department of Medicine, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan, 9Medical Research Centre, Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Jamshoro, Pakistan, 10Department of Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan, 11Master of Public Health, Michigan State University, USA
Objective:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Edaravone-dexborneol in patients with AIS by synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies.

 

Background:

Each year, approximately 15 million people suffer an acute ischemic stroke worldwide, of which 5 million suffer death and another 5 million are left with long-term disability. Existing treatments exhibit limited efficacy, warranting the investigation of novel therapeutic strategies. Edaravone and Dexborneol have surfaced as potential treatments for AIS, showing promise in facilitating neurological recovery and mobility.

Design/Methods:
We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar through October 2024 to identify RCTs and observational studies assessing Edaravone-dexborneol in AIS. Studies were screened for functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), safety events, and biomarker changes.
Results:

The findings indicate that the combination of Edaravone-dexborneol decreases the infarct size, oxidative stress, and inflammation in ischemic brain regions. RCTs demonstrated significant improvements in 90-day functional recovery with Edaravone-dexborneol compared with Edaravone alone or standard therapy. One multicenter phase III RCT reported favorable mRS outcomes in 67.2% of patients receiving Edaravone-dexborneol versus 59.0% with Edaravone alone (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.12–1.81; p=0.004). Another phase II trial found 70.7% of patients achieved mRS <2 versus 47.8% with standard therapy (p=0.031). Across studies, serious adverse events were infrequent, and the safety profile was comparable to existing treatments.

Conclusions:

This is among the first reviews synthesizing clinical trial evidence on Edaravone-dexborneol, by filling in the translational gap and exhibiting the safety and efficacy of this neuroprotective adjunct in improving outcomes in AIS. Current evidence is largely limited to Asian populations with short follow-up periods. Larger multicenter trials across diverse populations are needed to validate long-term efficacy and safety. If validated in diverse populations, this therapy provides neurologists with a neuroprotective adjunct to current AIS treatments and expands treatment options beyond time-limited reperfusion strategies.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000213036
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.