Objective:

To describe the role mentorship plays in resident well-being and professional development. Propose a structured near-peer mentorship model and share results of this program, conducted at one of the largest neurology residencies in the country. 

Background:

Mentorship is a cornerstone of medical education, influencing academic achievement, career trajectory, and trainee well-being. Traditionally, mentorship models emphasize relationships between trainees and senior faculty, such as attending physicians. However, near-peer mentorship—defined as a reciprocal relationship between learners at adjacent stages of training, such as between junior and senior residents—offers unique advantages. These include enhanced relatability, approachability, and timely guidance grounded in recent experience. Despite its potential, near-peer mentorship remains understudied, particularly within the context of residency training.

Design/Methods:

A mixed-methods research approach combining quantitative and qualitative strategies. This includes an analysis of pre- and post-surveys tailored to mentors and mentees, as well as focus group interviews to learn more about the efficacy of this program and areas for improvement going forward. 

Results:

A near-peer mentorship program was implemented to support neurology residents. Among mentors (n = 30), 93.3% anticipated benefiting from participation, citing networking (finding mentors and connecting with peers), advice and career development, and communication and leadership skills as primary interests. Among mentees (n = 35), 100% expected to benefit, with networking, subspecialty exploration, and wellness/work–life balance emerging as the most frequent themes. Mentor–mentee pairs were matched by prelim year location, subspecialty and academic interests, geographic background, and hobbies, and were encouraged to engage at least monthly. Post-program survey data (n = 8) showed 100% perceived the program as beneficial; 87.5% reported contact every few months and 12.5% monthly contact. Communication occurred virtually for 62.5% and in person for 37.5% of respondents.

Conclusions:

Preliminary survey data from our institution highlight both a strong desire for near-peer support and a clear gap in current mentorship offerings.