Nationwide Analysis of Program Directors in ACGME-accredited Adult Neurology Residency Programs
Objective:
To systematically compile and analyze demographic, educational, and professional characteristics of residency program directors across all ACGME-accredited adult neurology residency programs in the United States.
Background:
Residency program directors play a critical role in shaping graduate medical education. With the growing number of neurology residency programs, understanding the trends among neurology program directors provides insight into leadership diversity, training pathways, and the evolving structure of neurology education.
Design/Methods:
A cross-sectional review was conducted on all ACGME-accredited adult neurology residency programs in the United States using public data sources, including ACGME, FREIDA, institutional websites, published literature, and social media. Information not explicitly available from sources was documented as unavailable. Program director demographics, training backgrounds, advanced degrees, and additional qualifications were compiled. The data were organized into structured tables to facilitate descriptive analysis and identification of trends.
Results:
For the 2026 ERAS residency application cycle, 193 neurology programs are listed to participate. Program directors had a mean age in the 40s, with gender distribution nearing parity (approximately 55% to 45%). Most had completed fellowship training, with vascular neurology (~20%) and neurophysiology (~25%) among the most common. A smaller proportion reported additional advanced degrees, including PhD, MBA, MPH, and MS. Tenure varied, with some directors newly appointed within the past year and others serving for more than a decade, highlighting both continuity and turnover in leadership.
Conclusions:
Neurology residency program directors in the United States are predominantly mid-career physicians with near-universal fellowship training and substantial academic experience, reflecting a stable leadership profile. Overall, gender representation has moved closer to parity, though data for racial and ethnic diversity remains limited. Documenting these attributes establishes a foundation for future discussions on diversity, representation, and career development in neurology program leadership, while also creating a resource to guide trainees, educators, and institutions in shaping the next generation of academic leaders.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.