Risdiplam and Nusinersen in Adults With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Single Center Study of Changes in Functional Status and Barriers to Care
Kirtana Ananth1, Pooja Rao2, Micah Hamilton3
1Georgetown University School of Medicine, 2Neurology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
Objective:
To study longitudinal outcomes in adults with Type II and III SMA treated with nusinersen, risdiplam and switched (from nusinersen to risdiplam), comparing function and reasons for loss-to-follow-up. 
Background:

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations or deletions in the SMN1 gene. While pediatric trials demonstrate benefits of nusinersen and risdiplam, adult data remain limited. No direct comparisons on outcomes after switching therapies exist. 

Design/Methods:

Retrospective chart review of 60 adults with SMA undergoing treatment at a single center from 2017–2025, including 20 on active therapy and 40 patients lost to follow-up. Descriptive analyses including longitudinal RULM and HFMSE scores, excluding patients with <2 scores. Baseline was defined as the most recent score before, or first score available within one year of treatment initiation. IRB addendum to interview patients lost-to-follow-up pending.

Results:

Average treatment duration 5.7 ± 1.4 years for nusinersen (n=7, IDs: N, M, O, P, Q, R, S), 2.75 +/- 2.06 years for risdiplam (n=2, IDs: A, I) and 7.3 ± 0.5 years for switchers (nusinersen → risdiplam; n=5, IDs: E, C, G, J, K).

Nusinersen: Δmean RULM = 1.0 ± 1.7 (Δ/year ≈ +0.19 ± 0.28). Δmean HFMSE = +3.2 ± 3.4 (Δ/year ≈ +0.6 ± 0.7).

Risdiplam: ΔRULM = +4; ΔI RULM = 0. 

Switchers: Improvement: ΔE,RULM= +4, ΔE,HFMSE= +1 and ΔG,HFMSE= +6. Decreased scores: ΔC,RULM= - 2, ΔJ,RULM= - 2, ΔK,RULM= - 5. Stable: ΔC,RULM=0.

28% of patient lost to follow resided >30 miles away from the hospital center, compared to 13% active patients, suggesting geographic barriers to sustained care.

Conclusions:

Nusinersen and risdiplam were associated with stable/modestly improved motor outcomes in adult SMA patients. A subset of patients showed continued improvement after switching therapies, suggesting potential benefit of sequential treatment. Despite the single-center sample, trends underscore the importance of longitudinal follow-up and addressing barriers to care. 

10.1212/WNL.0000000000212760
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.