Use of Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) Scores in Autoimmune Encephalitis (AE)
Ahya Ali1, Joao Vitor Mahler2, Bruna Leles Vieira de Souza2, Giovanna Manzano3
1Westchester Medical Center, 2Division of Neuroimmunology and Neuroinfectious Diseases, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 3MGH Department of Neurology
Objective:
To compare the use of CASE and Modified Rankin score (mRS) scores for description of functional impairment and correlate with treatment responsiveness.
Background:
Diagnosis of AE is challenging due to a heterogenous clinical spectrum and approach to diagnosis and treatment of seronegative AE is an area of need.
Design/Methods:
Cases of seropositive and seronegative autoimmune encephalitis, fulfilling Graus et al. (2016) diagnostic criteria, were identified within a 12-month period from two academic medical centers. Retrospective chart review for extraction of pre-defined clinical data was performed. CASE and mRS scores calculated by independent investigators (GM, AA) to permit comparison of inter-rater agreement.
Results:
20 cases of AE identified; 6 (30%) seropositive and 14 (70%) seronegative. Mean age 63 years (SD 14.9); 55% Female. 7 cases met criteria for definite limbic AE , 6 for probable seronegative AE, 7 for possible seronegative AE. Most common clinical manifestations were seizures in probable AE (n=5, 45.5%; p=0.04), psychiatric changes in definite limbic AE (n=5, 55.6%; p=0.02). At nadir of initial hospitalization, median CASE scores were 7 (IQR 2), 6.5 (IQR 7) ,12 (IQR=11), median mRS scores were 3 (IQR 1), 3.5 (IQR 2), 4 (IQR 2) for definite limbic, probable and possible AE. 17 patients (85%) received first-line treatment (IV corticosteroids, IVIg) within first two weeks of hospitalization [median 3 days (IQR 9)]. At initial outpatient follow-up median CASE scores were 3.5 (IQR 1), 6 (IQR 5), 2 (IQR 2), and median mRS scores were 3 (IQR 2), 3 (IQR 3), 1 (IQR2). At first outpatient follow up 85.7% (n=12) demonstrated improvement in CASE scores as compared to 50% (n=7) in mRS scores.
Conclusions:
Longitudinal assessment of CASE scores from nadir of initial presentation may provide a better estimation of functional impairment related to AE, and is incompletely captured by mRS scores for individuals with seropositive and seronegative AE.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.