Analyzing the Neurology Residency Matching Outcomes in the Texas STAR Database
Adam Ali1, Samuel Salib1, Nilofaur Tehrani1, Gurkiranjeet Gakhal1, Ryan Chowdhury1, Ubaid Ansari1, Layla Ali1, Maaz Asim2, Angela Mihalic3, Michael Wong1
1California Northstate University College of Medicine, 2University of California, Davis, 3University of Texas Southwestern Medical School
Objective:
This study aims to identify predictors of successful matches into U.S.-based neurology residency programs following the shift to pass-fail grading for USMLE Step 1.
Background:
Historically, USMLE Step 1 scores were crucial in residency selection. Recent trends, however, emphasize a holistic review, considering factors like resident well-being and program location over exam scores. Gaps remain in understanding the impact of virtual interviews, extracurriculars, and the experiences of international medical graduates (IMGs), particularly after the Step 1 grading change.
Design/Methods:
This retrospective study analyzed neurology residency applicant data from the Texas STAR database (2019–2024). Following IRB exemption, metrics such as research output, leadership roles, Step 2 scores, and program signaling were evaluated. ANOVA and T-tests were used to determine statistically significant predictors of match success.
Results:
Among 1,017 matched neurology applicants, the mean number of abstracts presented increased from 2018 (mean = 4.65, SD = 3.79, CI [3.89, 5.39]) to 2024 (mean = 5.63, SD = 3.89, CI [5.05, 6.22], p < 0.05). Leadership roles, publications, and research experiences increased until 2023 but declined in 2024. Volunteer experiences have decreased from 6.17 to 4.11 (p <0.01). Step 2 scores rose from 2018 (mean = 220.42) to 2023 (mean = 225), then decreased in 2024 (mean = 218.25). Clerkship honors fluctuated but peaked in 2024 (mean = 3.51, SD = 2.32, CI [3.15, 3.87]). Comparing unmatched applicants to matched applicants over time, clerkship honors has been the only continuous statistically significant factor for match success (p = 0.02). Program signaling became increasingly predictive, with 47.1% of 2024 applicants matching to a signaled program. No significant changes were found in gender, underrepresented minorities, or first-generation applicants.
Conclusions:
Following the transition to pass-fail Step 1, research output has become increasingly important whereas extracurriculars, clerkship honors and step 2 scores have remained important.
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.