Tuning the Brain for Language: Exploring tACS as a Language Enhancement Tool
Abigail Perelman1, Roy Hamilton2, Denise Harvey2
1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 2Neurology, University of Pennsylvania
Objective:
To determine the efficacy of a noninvasive neuromodulation technique, called transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), in facilitating language abilities. 
Background:
Aphasia, an acquired language impairment following brain injury, is the most common focal cognitive disorder caused by stroke, affecting ~30% of stroke survivors. Speech-language therapy is the current mainstay of aphasia treatment, but residual language impairments persist, limiting quality of life. Transcranial electrical stimulation has garnered considerable attention as an alternative, noninvasive aphasia treatment. Emerging evidence suggests that tACS can manipulate and enhance endogenous cortical oscillations in a functionally specific way, inaccessible by direct current stimulation (tDCS). This ongoing study is investigating if tACS delivered in the alpha frequency band improves word retrieval abilities in healthy older adults by enhancing language network functional connectivity. 
Design/Methods:
Across two sessions, participants are randomized to receive placebo (sham) or active tACS to the frontotemporal cortex via a 5-electrode montage at a 4mA peak-to-peak intensity. Individual peak alpha frequency (8-13Hz) is identified during language task performance before tACS administration. Resting-state EEG is collected before, mid-way, and after tACS. During and immediately following stimulation, participants perform three naming tasks that involve retrieving words under two conditions: high competition (many possible responses) and low competition (single correct response). Of interest is the size of this interference effect (high minus low competition) following alpha vs. sham tACS. 
Results:

Preliminary data (n==4) reveals a comparable interference effect during the first 10 minutes of alpha and sham tACS. However, during the second 10 minutes of stimulation, interference is reduced during active vs. sham tACS (294 vs. 493ms, respectively). This is also true following alpha vs. sham tACS (-12 vs. 71ms, respectively). EEG data analysis is underway.

Conclusions:
Overall, this work will inform more precise noninvasive care compared to tDCS, laying the groundwork for employing tACS as an adjuvant to speech-language therapy.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000212378
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.