Predictive Value of Early Quantitative EEG Features in Critically Ill Moderate-severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patient Prognostication
Kotaro Tsutsumi1, Shenyu Tong1, Brian Jung1, Yama Akbari1, Sara Stern-Nezer1, Cyrus Dastur1, Wengui Yu1, Walter Valesky1, Sonja Darwish1, Michelle Goodwin1, Jefferson Chen2, Michael Lekawa3, Areg Grigorian3, Jeffry Nahmias3, Kurt Qing1, Patrick Chen1
1Department of Neurology, 2Department of Neurosurgery, 3Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine
Objective:
To evaluate predictive performance of quantitative electroencephalogram (qEEG) features in predicting outcomes among moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) patients.
Background:
EEG is utilized among critically ill TBI patients for detection of seizure and non-convulsive status epilepticus; however, role of qEEG in prognostication has not been thoroughly explored.
Design/Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the University of California, Irvine TBI and Concussion (NTBIC) database (10/2023-3/2024). Patients with msTBI (GCS <8, requiring neuromonitoring, complex TBI cases per surgical ICU) were included. Poor outcome was defined as discharge Modified Ranking Scale (mRS) ≥5. For select EEG electrode contacts, 5-minute EEG segments at every 4-hour intervals were extracted from first 24 hours of EEG data. Prognostic capacity of qEEG features were assessed via univariate analysis (t-test/chi-square), multivariable logistic-regression, and mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC) over a fivefold cross validation. Analysis was conducted using MATLAB/Python.
Results:
47 patients (29.8% female, 55.3% non-white) with a mean age of 49.0±22.3 were included. 1 patient had an electrographic seizure. Mean amplitude, delta, beta, and total-power were higher (p<0.05), and there were no differences in use of sedation between patients with good vs. poor outcomes (p>0.05). On multivariate logistic regression, after controlling for age, sex, race, admission GCS, dilated pupil on arrival, and use of any sedation, beta (OR=0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.54, p=0.023), delta (OR=0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.96, p=0.013), and total-power (OR=1.16, 95% CI 1.03-1.31, p=0.018) predicted poor outcome. AUCROC using age, admission GCS, and pupils was 0.72±0.17. Adding beta, total-power, and delta, yielded AUCROC of 0.69±0.17, 0.72±0.15, 0.74±0.17 respectively. Combination models of delta/total-power and beta/delta/total-power yielded 0.75±0.18 and 0.77±0.14, respectively.
Conclusions:
qEEG features, notably beta/delta power and total-power, have satisfactory predictive value of ICU-TBI outcome when added to clinical features. Future studies will prospectively validate models and test alternative machine learning methods.
10.1212/WNL.0000000000212375
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.