Study of Onboarding for Neurology APPs (SONAr): Lessons Learned from the 1-year Interim Data Analysis
Daniel Harrison1, Margaret Naclerio2, Kathryn Swider3, Joel Morgenlander4, Shannon Anderson5, Calli Cook6, Deena Rodney7, Megan Kennelly8, Elyse Doherty2, Cassie Meffert9, Alexander King10, Scott Friedenberg11, Nathaniel Robbins12, Ariel Nowicki2, Fnu Alfandy13, Kasser Saba14, Pavan Vaswani15, Allison Hennigan16, Holly Bischof15, Abigail Taylor17, Jason Johns18, Shivani Ghoshal19, Alyssa Bautista19, John Emmett20, Christopher Doughty2
1Boston Medical Center, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, 3Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 4Duke University Medical Center, 5Oregon Health & Science University, 6Emory Healthcare, 7Neurology Associates, PA, 8Sharp HealthCare, 9UW Health, 10UVA Health, 11Geisinger Medical Center, 12Mass General Brigham, 13Stanford Health Care, 14Atrium Health, 15University of Pennsylvania, 16UT Tyler School of Medicine, 17Mayo Clinic Hopsital, 18Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 19Columbia University Medical Center, 20IU Health Physicians
Objective:

To describe typical longitudinal development of self-efficacy and entrustment of new neurology advanced practice providers (APPs) over their first year of practice.

Background:

APPs are key contributers to neurology teams. However, APP degree programs offer limited clinical neurology education. On-the-job training is critical for ensuring success in neurologic practice, but data to inform best practices are limited.

Design/Methods:

This was a prospective, multi-center, longitudinal survey-based study. Participants were APPs in their first year of neurology practice across the United States. We developed a survey instrument to evaluate participant training activities, self-efficacy, and entrustment. The survey was administered at 0-, 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-start date.

Results:

Through one year, 26 participants (14 outpatient, 8 inpatient, 2 hybrid; 14 physician assistants, 12 nurse practitioners) have been enrolled, completeing 65 individual surveys. A neurology APP fellowship was previously completed by 5 participants. Participants reported engaging in 4-5 hours of reading per week in the first 3 months but only reported 1-1.5 hours of didactic time per week throughout the first year. Only one participant reported any simulation training at any time point. Compared with other diseases, participants reported highest self-efficacy in headache management (62.0-82.4, 100-point self-efficacy scale) and lowest self-efficacy in brain tumor management (26.3-39.9) throughout the study. Self-efficacy in epilepsy management increased most (39.9-69.1). By month 3, most participants reported typically taking a history (11/14) and performing an exam (13/14) without a supervisor immediately available. By 6 months, only 5/10 participants reported most often recommending and interpreting diagnostic testing without a supervisor immediately available.

Conclusions:

Training activities for new neurology APPs are mostly self-directed. Neuro-oncology and recommending and interpreting diagnostic testing may be unique educational needs for these clinicians. Enrollment of additional participants will facilitate between group comparisons to determine which educational strategies most effectively foster entrustment and self-efficacy among new neurology APPs.

10.1212/WNL.0000000000212360
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.