A Meta-Analysis Comparing Endovascular Carotid Artery Stenting and Open Carotid Revascularisation in Managing Radiation-Induced Carotid Stenosis.
Shruthi Raghunandan1, Advaith Rao2, Vinay Chandramouli Bellur2, Ananya Prasad2, Shradha Chervittara Karaveetil2, Pavan Kumara Kasam Shiva3, Sonali Belankar2, Era Gupta3, Adithya Sathya Narayana2
1Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, 2MS Ramaiah Medical College, 3Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute
Objective:

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular carotid artery stenting in comparison to open carotid revascularization techniques in treating radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis.


Background:

Cervical irradiation is well known to cause carotid artery stenosis. The benefit of an endovascular approach in treating radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis has not been well studied. 


Design/Methods:

A comprehensive search was conducted in major medical databases. The primary outcome studied was 30-day stroke and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes studied included late mortality and restenosis rates.  The statistical analysis was performed in R-Studio. The Mantel-Haenszel method (common effect model) and the Inverse variance method (random effects model) were used to obtain Risk ratios. The I^2 test was used to determine the heterogeneity between studies.


Results:

544 articles were screened with 9 full-text articles retrieved. After various exclusions, 6 articles were used in the final analysis.

The meta-analysis involved 6 studies with 611 patients undergoing an endovascular approach and 1251 patients undergoing conventional open carotid revascularization techniques. The analysis indicated that the risk of early stroke, and early mortality was similar in both the groups.  There was a significant reduction in the risk of cranial nerve injury following the endovascular approach [RR=0.23 (95%CI, p = 0.13, I^2 = 43%)]. The risk of late restenosis was higher in the Endovascular treatment group [RR=1.45(95%CI, p = 0.95, I^2 = 0%) 


Conclusions:

Endovascular Carotid Artery Stenting (ECAS) shows significant benefits in comparison to Open Carotid Revascularization Techniques (OCRT) in the treatment of Radiation-Induced Carotid Artery Stenosis. The Endovascular approach showed a considerably lower risk of Cranial Nerve Injury. The risk of early stroke and early mortality were found to be similar in both groups while the incidence of late re-stenosis was increased in the Endovascular approach.


10.1212/WNL.0000000000212149
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.