Reliability and Validity of the Transthyretin Amyloidosis – Quality of Life (ATTR-QOL) Questionnaire Impact Scales
Kristen McCausland1, Kristen Hsu2, Andrew Lovley1, Isabelle Lousada2, Kaitlin LaGasse1, Sabrina Rebello2, Jakob Bjorner1, Michelle Carty1
1QualityMetric, an IQVIA business, 2Amyloidosis Research Consortium
Objective:

To evaluate the structural validity, reliability, and construct validity of the ATTR-QOL Impact scales. 

Background:
Transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis is a rare disease with heterogenous clinical presentation. This heterogeneity introduces challenges in the measurement of health-related quality of life. The ATTR-QOL is a disease-specific, patient-reported outcome measure developed to capture the symptoms and impacts from patients across all types of ATTR amyloidosis (i.e., hereditary and wild-type). 
Design/Methods:
Adult patients with symptomatic ATTR amyloidosis in the United States completed the ATTR-QOL at 2 timepoints, along with additional surveys which served as criterion measures. Factor analyses and tests of differential item functioning (DIF) were conducted to confirm a hypothesized domain structure and identify redundant items. A scoring algorithm was proposed and tested. Psychometric analyses included tests of internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity.
Results:
The analytic sample included 233 participants. Factor analysis and tests of DIF identified redundant items and supported the formation of 4 impact domains: Daily Activities, Social/Role Functioning, Emotional Wellbeing, and Physical Functioning. Results were confirmed with a secondary dataset. The proposed scoring algorithm was refined. Twelve impact items were dropped from the ATTR-QOLv2 as a result of factor and DIF analyses. Results supported the internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and known-groups validity of the ATTR-QOL Impact scales. Patients with worse symptom severity, cardiac functioning, or unemployment due to ATTR amyloidosis had worse ATTR-QOL Impact scale scores. 
Conclusions:
Findings support the use of the 4 ATTR-QOL Impact scales in patients with ATTR amyloidosis. This study resulted in updates to the ATTR-QOL for item reduction and the development of a scoring algorithm. Future work will be conducted in a clinical setting to explore responsiveness and establish meaningful within-patient change thresholds. 
10.1212/WNL.0000000000212140
Disclaimer: Abstracts were not reviewed by Neurology® and do not reflect the views of Neurology® editors or staff.